1996
DOI: 10.1126/science.274.5288.744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fennoscandian Earthquakes: Whole Crustal Rupturing Related to Postglacial Rebound

Abstract: Local and regional earthquake locations provide seismic evidence that large shield earthquakes have occurred in northern Fennoscandia. These paleoearthquakes, with fault lengths of up to 160 kilometers and average displacements of up to 15 meters, were triggered by nonisostatic compressive stresses caused by the removal of the ice at the end of the last deglaciation. The Fennoscandian faults were probably formed by single events that ruptured through most of the crust. The largest event, moment magnitude M, -8… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
139
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
11
139
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The possibility that the retreat of ice from Scandinavia and elsewhere after the last glaciation gave rise to severe earthquakes, up to M w = 8·0, due to differential crustal stresses resulting from substantial ice unloading and sea-level rise (e.g. Stewart et al, 2000;Arvidsson, 1996;Zoback and Grollimund, 2001;Olesen et al, 2004) is being increasingly debated, while Davenport et al (1989) and Firth and Stewart (2000) summarize evidence for post-glacial seismic activity in Scotland that was apparently much more intense than the present-day low level of seismicity. The repeated Pleistocene glaciations and deglaciations seem likely to have caused similar or greater crustal stresses and seismic activity many times during the last two million or so years.…”
Section: Presence Of External (Seismic) Triggermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The possibility that the retreat of ice from Scandinavia and elsewhere after the last glaciation gave rise to severe earthquakes, up to M w = 8·0, due to differential crustal stresses resulting from substantial ice unloading and sea-level rise (e.g. Stewart et al, 2000;Arvidsson, 1996;Zoback and Grollimund, 2001;Olesen et al, 2004) is being increasingly debated, while Davenport et al (1989) and Firth and Stewart (2000) summarize evidence for post-glacial seismic activity in Scotland that was apparently much more intense than the present-day low level of seismicity. The repeated Pleistocene glaciations and deglaciations seem likely to have caused similar or greater crustal stresses and seismic activity many times during the last two million or so years.…”
Section: Presence Of External (Seismic) Triggermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Making the same approximation for all earthquakes modeled here and comparing with corresponding stress drop approximation for the glacially induced earthquake in the Pärvie fault in northern Scandinavia suggests that four of the models displayed are well on the conservative side. The slip/width ratio for the Pärvie earthquake is based on estimates by Arvidsson [5] and Wood [12]. For the Uemachi fault and for the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake it is based on models by Sekiguchi et al [15] and Ma et al [16], respectively.…”
Section: Stress Drop and Fault Slip Velocitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The continuum was assumed to be linearly elastic with generic parameter values; Young's modulus 75 GPa, Poisson's ratio 0.25 and density 2700 kg/m 3 . Postglacial, or end-glacial, stress states are characterized by high horizontal stresses which are due to down-warping and/or tectonic strain accumulated under the stabilizing ice cover, whereas the vertical stress corresponds to the rock overburden [5,12,13]. Here, the major initial horizontal stress was oriented normally to the fault strike and calibrated to give the average fault displacement needed to obtain the intended seismic moment.…”
Section: Model Outlinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If these PG faults were formed in single seismic events, their formation would have required the occurrence of earthquakes with magnitudes up to M w < 7 -8 (e.g. Muir-Wood 1989;Arvidsson 1996;Bungum & Lindholm 1997;Olesen et al 2004). Hence, their presence indicates a much stronger seismicity than the present-day intraplate seismicity of stable continental regions that are generally characterized by smaller earthquakes (M w # 4) (Ahjos & Uski 1992;Bungum & Lindholm 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%