Fence Technique: Guided Bone Regeneration for Extensive Three- Dimensional Augmentation

Merli, Mauro; Moscatelli, Marco; Mazzoni, Annalisa; Mazzoni, Simona; Pagliaro, Umberto; Breschi, Lorenzo; Motroni, Alessandro; Nieri, Michele

doi:10.11607/prd.1175

Cited by 11 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…19 The main cause of GBR failure is related to early or late exposure of the barrier device, leading to contamination and infection of the biomaterials, irreversibly compromising bone regeneration. [16][17][18][42][43][44] Other complications, such as the onset of an abscess with purulent exudate, can also lead to a complete failure of GBR even without exposure of the membrane. 19 In this study, healing complications in Group A were limited to one case of early membrane exposure with infection, one abscess without exposure, and one case of late membrane exposure without infection.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The main cause of GBR failure is related to early or late exposure of the barrier device, leading to contamination and infection of the biomaterials, irreversibly compromising bone regeneration . Other complications, such as the onset of an abscess with purulent exudate, can also lead to a complete failure of GBR even without exposure of the membrane…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Evaluation of complication rates and vertical bone gain after guided bone regeneration with non‐resorbable membranes versus titanium meshes and resorbable membranes. A randomized clinical trial

Cucchi

Vignudelli

Napolitano

et al. 2017

Clin Implant Dent Rel Res

115

133

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundThe partial edentulous posterior mandible is often a challenge area that requires a bone reconstructive surgery for implants placement.PurposeThis RCT was aimed to evaluate complications rate and vertical bone gain after Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) with dense non‐resorbable d‐PTFE titanium‐reinforced membranes (Group A) versus titanium meshes covered by cross‐linked collagen membranes (Group B).Material and Methods40 partially edentulous patients with atrophic posterior mandible, were randomly divided into two study group: 20 patients were treated with one stage GBR by means of non‐resorbable d‐PTFE titanium‐reinforced membranes (Group A); and 20 patients, by means of titanium mesh covered by cross‐linked collagen membranes (Group B). All complications were recorded, distinguishing between “surgical” and “healing” and between “minor” or “major.”. Primary implants stability and vertical bone gain were also evaluated.ResultsIn the group A, surgical and healing complication rates were 5.0% and 15.0%, respectively. In the group B, surgical and healing complication rates were 15.8% and 21.1%, respectively. No significant differences between two study group were observed regarding complications rate implant stability and vertical bone gain.ConclusionsBoth GBR approaches for the restoration of atrophic posterior mandible achieved similar results regarding complications, vertical bone gain and implant stability.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of complication rates and vertical bone gain after guided bone regeneration with non‐resorbable membranes versus titanium meshes and resorbable membranes. A randomized clinical trial

Cucchi

Vignudelli

Napolitano

et al. 2017

Clin Implant Dent Rel Res

115

133

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The surgical technique illustrated in this study can be utilized together with vertical techniques, such as the Fence technique for partially or totally edentulous patients (Merli et al. ). However, in the present study, patients treated with the Fence technique were excluded.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A minimally invasive technique for lateral maxillary sinus floor elevation: a Bayesian network study

Merli

Moscatelli

Mariotti

et al. 2014

Clinical Oral Implants Res

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…21,22 These techniques can result in significantly enhanced bone regeneration with minimal patient discomfort. 23 The effectiveness of a customized, three-dimensional, preformed titanium mesh as a barrier membrane for peri-implant alveolar bone regeneration has proven to result in satisfactory bone regeneration. 22 In general, the application of individual digital design and rapid prototyping in the reconstruction of bony defects seems promising.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Customized Titanium Lattice Structure in Three-Dimensional Alveolar Defect: An Initial Case Letter

Seiler

Kämmerer

Peetz³

et al. 2018

Journal of Oral Implantology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Fence Technique: Guided Bone Regeneration for Extensive Three- Dimensional Augmentation

Cited by 11 publications

References 0 publications

Evaluation of complication rates and vertical bone gain after guided bone regeneration with non‐resorbable membranes versus titanium meshes and resorbable membranes. A randomized clinical trial

Evaluation of complication rates and vertical bone gain after guided bone regeneration with non‐resorbable membranes versus titanium meshes and resorbable membranes. A randomized clinical trial

A minimally invasive technique for lateral maxillary sinus floor elevation: a Bayesian network study

Customized Titanium Lattice Structure in Three-Dimensional Alveolar Defect: An Initial Case Letter

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About