2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.08.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Femtosecond Lasers for LASIK Flap Creation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the 100 μm cut depth was slightly smoother than deeper cuts, the difference was not statistically significant. Because the 100 μm cut depth is similar to a common LASIK setting, which produces excellent visual outcomes, 29 it is likely that the microscopic smoothness of deeper lamellar cuts is also compatible with good visual outcomes. However, the uniformity in microscopic roughness between different cut depths could also be attributed to the small sample size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the 100 μm cut depth was slightly smoother than deeper cuts, the difference was not statistically significant. Because the 100 μm cut depth is similar to a common LASIK setting, which produces excellent visual outcomes, 29 it is likely that the microscopic smoothness of deeper lamellar cuts is also compatible with good visual outcomes. However, the uniformity in microscopic roughness between different cut depths could also be attributed to the small sample size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is evidenced that femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) is an established, effective, and safe technique used to treat myopia and myopic astigmatism 19. The creation of a flap thickness ranging from 100 to 130 μm with a standard deviation of 10–15 μm using femtosecond lasers is considered state of the art 2,3,7.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison studies are still being conducted comparing laser devices and mechanical microkeratomes. The laser devices have been found to be as good as or better than mechanical microkeratomes, but long-term results are still needed 3. Therefore, refinement of cutting quality with regard to morphology of cutting surfaces and edges is ongoing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%