2017
DOI: 10.2514/1.j055325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Femtosecond Laser Electronic Excitation Tagging Velocimetry in a Transonic, Cryogenic Wind Tunnel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The data take this form because of the boresight imaging configuration; a greater degree of elongation corresponds to a larger angle between the laser beam propagation direction and the imaging line of sight. Unlike the FLEET data taken in preliminary tests [35], which showed a nearly axisymmetric intensity distribution, the FLEET data are much more ragged in appearance and lack radial symmetry.…”
Section: Fleet Signal Processingcontrasting
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The data take this form because of the boresight imaging configuration; a greater degree of elongation corresponds to a larger angle between the laser beam propagation direction and the imaging line of sight. Unlike the FLEET data taken in preliminary tests [35], which showed a nearly axisymmetric intensity distribution, the FLEET data are much more ragged in appearance and lack radial symmetry.…”
Section: Fleet Signal Processingcontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…The position of the FLEET signal within each image was then precisely located utilizing a custom surface fitting algorithm, the shifted, rotated, generic ellipsoid (SRGE) algorithm [38]. This surface fitting technique fits a generic ellipsoidal function to the data, which allows for polar variations in the intensity distribution not afforded by simple Gaussian or bi-Gaussian fits [35]. The mathematical details of this fitting algorithm can be found in [38].…”
Section: Fleet Signal Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When presented as a percentage, the standard error represents the average percent error of all velocity measurements included in the calculation. Standard error was found to be 1.6%, which is consistent with previous FLEET and PLEET measurements in the 0.3 m TCT that found the accuracy to lie between 0.6% and 2.1% [28,30,42]. This standard error also shows that the STARFLEET method not only performs roughly as well as laser Doppler velocimetry in the 0.3 m TCT (which obtained typical velocity measurement error less than 1% [22]), but does so more consistently and over a broader range of conditions.…”
Section: Velocity Measurement Accuracysupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The incident 100 fs laser dissociates the nitrogen molecules into atoms, which subsequently recombine into the excited B state of molecular nitrogen, which emits in the red and near infrared through the first positive transition to the A state. FLEET is used in a wide range of applications, including subsonic [134,[139][140][141], transonic [136,[142][143][144], and hypersonic [145][146][147][148] flow fields. At present, FLEET has been successfully applied in nitrogen [134,140,141,[149][150][151][152], argon [139,[153][154][155], air [141,147,156,157], 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane [158], helium [159], carbon dioxide [159], oxygen [159], and combustion [141,148,160] flow fields.…”
Section: Tagging Velocimetry Based On Femtosecond Laser-induced Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%