2021
DOI: 10.1097/ico.0000000000002937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Femtosecond Laser and Mechanical Dissection for ICRS and MyoRing Implantation: A Meta-Analysis

Abstract: Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since 1991 and the first ICRS implanted in humans [36], significant improvements in design [25], tunnel creation [37], and segment insertion techniques have led to better postsurgical outcomes [10] and reduction of complications [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since 1991 and the first ICRS implanted in humans [36], significant improvements in design [25], tunnel creation [37], and segment insertion techniques have led to better postsurgical outcomes [10] and reduction of complications [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ICRS implantation is associated with potential complications such as infectious keratitis, asymmetric or superficial segment displacement, segment extrusion, posterior corneal perforations, corneal stromal edema around the incision, extension of the incision towards the central visual axis, halos, and glares [10,20]. These complications have become rarer since the tunnel creation for the insertion of ICRS is no longer performed mechanically but commonly carried out using femtosecond laser (Fs laser) [20,21]. Besides these complications, intrastromal structural changes such as peri-segmental fibrosis [22] and intrastromal lamellar channel deposits have been observed with slit lamp, in vivo confocal microscopy and optical coherence tomography [4,[23][24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Fs laser technology (IntraLase FS laser; Johnson & Johnson Vision, Santa Ana, CA) with a pulse energy of 1.5 mJ was used to create a circular tunnel (360 degrees) into the deep corneal stroma and the incision to insert the ICRS. 12 The insertion of ICRS was performed manually under topical anesthesia. ICRS thickness and arc length was adapted individually according to the manufacturer's nomogram (AJL Ophthalmic S.A., Minao, Spain), depending on the patient's preoperative corneal astigmatism, ectasia topographic phenotype, and coma.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a clear advantage of fewer intraoperative complications with FSL than traditional manual tunnel creation. [ 43 , 44 ] Complications include corneal perforation, infection, and implant displacement, although rare and significantly less frequent than mechanical techniques. [ 43 , 44 ] Regarding visual, refractive, and aberrometric outcomes, FSL and mechanical techniques offer similar outcomes.…”
Section: Intracorneal Ring Segmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 43 , 44 ] Complications include corneal perforation, infection, and implant displacement, although rare and significantly less frequent than mechanical techniques. [ 43 , 44 ] Regarding visual, refractive, and aberrometric outcomes, FSL and mechanical techniques offer similar outcomes. [ 40 , 41 , 43 , 44 ] A recent similar technique of FSL tunnel creation has been used in conjunction with corneal allogenic intrastromal ring segments as a potential treatment option for corneal ectasias.…”
Section: Intracorneal Ring Segmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%