2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ihj.2020.12.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Femoral artery access site closure with perclose suture mediated device in coronary interventions

Abstract: Objective To compare the outcome of suture mediated vascular closure device Perclose Proglide (PP) with manual compression (MC) following transfemoral access for coronary interventions (CI). Methods It is a retrospective, observational, single centre study from January 2018 to September 2019. Consecutive patients undergoing interventions through transfemoral access were divided into PP and MC groups. Those with less than 3 months follow up were excluded. Two groups were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(55 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No statistically significant differences were observed in terms of bleeding-related VASCs between the VCD group and the MC group in a recent meta-analysis (4.0% vs. 5.2%—RR: 0.77, CI, 0.60–1.00, p = 0.05) [ 18 ]. An interesting speculation is that VCD failure increased the incidence of minor bleeding complications and partially offset the benefits of VCD on hemostasis [ 18 , 58 , 59 , 60 ]. In our retrospective evaluation, we did not observe major vascular complications, with only one case of pseudoaneurysm treated by US-guided percutaneous injection of thrombin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No statistically significant differences were observed in terms of bleeding-related VASCs between the VCD group and the MC group in a recent meta-analysis (4.0% vs. 5.2%—RR: 0.77, CI, 0.60–1.00, p = 0.05) [ 18 ]. An interesting speculation is that VCD failure increased the incidence of minor bleeding complications and partially offset the benefits of VCD on hemostasis [ 18 , 58 , 59 , 60 ]. In our retrospective evaluation, we did not observe major vascular complications, with only one case of pseudoaneurysm treated by US-guided percutaneous injection of thrombin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible explanation is that VCDs indeed promote the efficiency of hemostasis, but the increased number of minor bleeding complications was driven by device failure [ 50 ]. We found evidence to support this explanation from the included studies, namely, that device failure increased the incidence of minor bleeding complications and partially offset the benefits of VCDs [ 35 , 38 , 41 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…After removing 462 duplicate studies, step by step screening was performed based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Eventually, 32 studies comprising 12 RCTs [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39], 17 observational studies [40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55], and 3 propensity-score matched studies [56][57][58] were included in this meta-analysis. Figure 1 shows the flowchart of inclusions and exclusions.…”
Section: Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The study was conducted in a prospective manner and the final sample of the study was determined as 80 patients. Power analysis was performed by evaluating the data of the reference literature on the subject, it was calculated that a total of 80 patients should be included, with a 95% confidence interval and a 20% margin of error [6]. The study started in December 2021 and finished in December 2022.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%