2010
DOI: 10.1177/1350506810377692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feminist technoscience studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To do this, we root our approach in feminist theories of technology [116] and technoscience e.g. [9][38] [66], entwined with critical-humanistic HCI as proposed by Bardzell and Bardzell in [14]. While it has been argued that designing for women risks ghettoizing them [24], or that a risk lies in designing technology explicitly for women [82], we will place an emphasis on approaches that embody lived experience, but that also position approaches to a woman's health as demanding of justice, in that it regards bodily integrity and takes women's rights into perspective.…”
Section: A Woman-centered Approach In Design Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To do this, we root our approach in feminist theories of technology [116] and technoscience e.g. [9][38] [66], entwined with critical-humanistic HCI as proposed by Bardzell and Bardzell in [14]. While it has been argued that designing for women risks ghettoizing them [24], or that a risk lies in designing technology explicitly for women [82], we will place an emphasis on approaches that embody lived experience, but that also position approaches to a woman's health as demanding of justice, in that it regards bodily integrity and takes women's rights into perspective.…”
Section: A Woman-centered Approach In Design Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, feminist technoscience has examined discursive and material aspects of ‘sociotechnical relations and processes of materialization [as] inextricably intertwined’, i.e. as entangled (Åsberg and Lykke, 2010: 299), 3 and has argued that it is necessary to examine how specific material-discursive entanglements co-produce the social, the technological and subjectivity (see Moser, 2006; Højgaard and Søndergaard, 2011; Johnson and Åsberg, 2017). Scholars have traced dynamic orderings of bodies, subjects and things, have examined material-discursive entanglements within for example medical and public health practices and have shown how specific subjectivities or subject positions co-emerge with them (see, for example: Lindén, 2017).…”
Section: Feminist Technoscience Subjectification and Subject Positionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feminist technoscience is a transdisciplinary field that studies how power relations impact on knowledge production in science and technology. The field challenges a positivist objectivity through an epistemology, where categorizations of gender, ethnicity, and class are entangled with sociomaterial practices in a globalized world (Åsberg & Lykke, ; Law & Singleton, ). Together with postcolonial STS, feminist technoscience challenges “unidirectional ‘diffusion’ models of science and modernity, where science, rationality, progress and enlightenment always rest in Europe or the West, to subsequently diffuse to non‐Western nations” (Pollock & Subramaniam, , p. 953).…”
Section: Feminist Technoscience and Postcolonial Computingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feminist technoscience is a transdisciplinary field that studies how power relations impact on knowledge production in science and technology. The field challenges a positivist objectivity through an epistemology, where categorizations of gender, ethnicity, and class are entangled with sociomaterial practices in a globalized world (Åsberg & Lykke, 2010;Law & Singleton, 2000).…”
Section: Of 11mentioning
confidence: 99%