2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00207.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feminist Politics and Feminist Pluralism: Can We Do Feminist Political Theory Without Theories of Gender?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Sharon Lloyd argues that it is a publicly recognized good to reproduce society from one generation to the next, which requires that the burdens associated with producing this good be more equitably shared across the populace (Lloyd ). Amy Baehr argues that a distribution of social goods derived from an assumption that contractors have an interest in ensuring that the needs of their dependents are met would also support social expenditure on child care and paid parental leave: “the determination of what goods count as basic, and the distribution of such basic goods, [would] not favor non‐dependency workers over those engaged in dependency work” (Baehr , 425). In what follows, I will assume that liberalism supports the more ambitious program, as typically argued by most liberal feminists.…”
Section: Liberalism and Feminism: The Story So Farmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For example, Sharon Lloyd argues that it is a publicly recognized good to reproduce society from one generation to the next, which requires that the burdens associated with producing this good be more equitably shared across the populace (Lloyd ). Amy Baehr argues that a distribution of social goods derived from an assumption that contractors have an interest in ensuring that the needs of their dependents are met would also support social expenditure on child care and paid parental leave: “the determination of what goods count as basic, and the distribution of such basic goods, [would] not favor non‐dependency workers over those engaged in dependency work” (Baehr , 425). In what follows, I will assume that liberalism supports the more ambitious program, as typically argued by most liberal feminists.…”
Section: Liberalism and Feminism: The Story So Farmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no doubt that core liberal arguments have been convincingly deployed by feminists to undermine some of the central causes of women's inequality, specifically the more iniquitous aspects of the gendered division of labor. Baehr suggests that although liberals cannot ensure that men and women choose an equal division of labor, they can ensure that the choice to prioritize care over work will be costless (Baehr , 433).…”
Section: Daddy Quotas and Liberalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“… For varied defenses of this claim, see vulnerability theorists (Goodin ; Mackenzie, Rogers, and Dodds ), care ethicists (Kittay ; Tronto , ; Held ; Engster ; Collins ), and feminist liberals (Baehr ; Bhandary ; Brake ; Hartley and Watson ; Nussbaum ; Robeyns ; Stark ; Varden ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%