2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2007.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feminist futures: From dystopia to eutopia?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, methods for challenging the co-option of the future were significantly less well-represented than critical approaches to the past. 10 One approach was to deny the importance of the future altogether (Edelman, 2004), or alternately, to maintain an orientation towards the future, but one which eschews the positing of perfect utopias in favour of working with the possibilities available in the present (Bhavnani and Foran, 2008). Others, notably Grosz (2005), questioned the emancipatory potential of a future that flowed from the present and instead emphasised the radical unpredictability of the future.…”
Section: Cross-cutting Themesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, methods for challenging the co-option of the future were significantly less well-represented than critical approaches to the past. 10 One approach was to deny the importance of the future altogether (Edelman, 2004), or alternately, to maintain an orientation towards the future, but one which eschews the positing of perfect utopias in favour of working with the possibilities available in the present (Bhavnani and Foran, 2008). Others, notably Grosz (2005), questioned the emancipatory potential of a future that flowed from the present and instead emphasised the radical unpredictability of the future.…”
Section: Cross-cutting Themesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of emancipatory progress can be found in small doses in Sri Lanka where the human rights and human security discourses have been instrumental in challenging the commodification of natural resources, land, labor and culture, and the global debate over the price of AIDS drugs (Bastian 2004:413). Others point to the Zapatista movement in Mexico, rubber tappers in Amazon, and Self‐Employed Women’s Union in India as other examples of counter‐hegemonic practices (Bhavnani and Foran 2008). And while none of these on their own represent a powerful counter‐hegemonic process, they do indicate the progress and movements toward emancipatory notions of human security that can be achieved when politics is based on agonism and conflict as opposed to consensus.…”
Section: Overcoming the Limitations Of Emancipation And Agonismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While critics of Boserup's work question the viability of a Western model of development for the poor in non-Western countries, her work led to a more comprehensive overview of women's roles in the development process, and made many international donor agencies aware of their inattention to women (Drolet, 2010). Bhavnani and Foran (2008) note that Boserup's (1970) work was taken seriously, partly because the development community began to realise that the trickle-down approach had not been effective. Thus, Boserup's work forms the basis of Women in Development (WID) approaches, and argues for treating women on equal terms with men (ibid.…”
Section: Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, Boserup's work forms the basis of Women in Development (WID) approaches, and argues for treating women on equal terms with men (ibid. ); this perspective, emerging from liberal feminist framework, argues that development would be more efficient if women were used as a resource in economic development (Bhavnani and Foran, 2008). However, as Drolet (2010) notes, this assumed mistakenly that all women could be emancipated under capitalist development by their incorporation in the public 'productive' sphere, in particular, by increasing their access to an expanding cash economy.…”
Section: Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation