2007
DOI: 10.1080/08038740701646739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feminism, Art, Deleuze, and Darwin: An Interview with Elizabeth Grosz

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…She notes, for example, that for Darwin, ‘the very machinery for generating biological difference is sexual difference. This informs Irigaray’s work, and it makes a very convincing and powerful argument for the ontological status of sexual difference’ (Kontturi and Tiainen, 2007: 249). And, we might add, for a feminist politics of and for the body, insofar as it is this difference that is so often glossed by philosophic, as well as geographic, work on bodies, corporeality and aesthetics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…She notes, for example, that for Darwin, ‘the very machinery for generating biological difference is sexual difference. This informs Irigaray’s work, and it makes a very convincing and powerful argument for the ontological status of sexual difference’ (Kontturi and Tiainen, 2007: 249). And, we might add, for a feminist politics of and for the body, insofar as it is this difference that is so often glossed by philosophic, as well as geographic, work on bodies, corporeality and aesthetics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 62%
“…This is, perhaps, another abyssal move, but one that does not depart from an understanding of the conditions for aesthetics and artistry being predicated on ‘nature as a dynamic open-endedness’ (Kontturi and Tiainen, 2007: 225). It is a move that, to be sure, refuses to pin back the aesthetic for careful scrutiny, and the enunciation of proper procedures for such an examination.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Engaging with the arts beyond representation but rather as an on-going in-becoming of meaning and meaning making means taking part in what happens here and now in its very materiality (Kontturi & Tiainen, 2007;Alaimo & Hekman, 2008;Bennett, 2010). Since 2017, Lena Haselmann, Janke Klok, and Lilli Mittner have explored, on the basis of the white, Western, classical canon, how to make middles matter (Tianinen et al, 2020) by creating dramatic assemblages in the sense of Deleuze and Guattari (1987).…”
Section: New Materialismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is this insight that made Deleuze's Darwinian and Bergsonian intuitions interesting to feminists. Instead of viewing sexual differences as a problem to be overcome, it is acknowledged as the basis of all becoming (Kontturi and Tiainen, 2007). In her reading of Deleuze's Bergsonism, Grosz draws on this distinction between 'external differences' or 'differences of nature' which constitute different entities and render them comparable, and 'constitutive or internal differences', which produce these differences of nature.…”
Section: Beyond Oppositional Differencementioning
confidence: 99%