2013
DOI: 10.5070/l3182017822
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feminism and the (Trans)gender Entrapment of Gender Nonconforming Prisoners

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The separation of people based on sex assigned at birth, a policy almost universally implemented in institutional settings (Brown and McDuffie, 2009 ; Routh et al., 2017), can create an inherently dangerous environment (Ledesma & Ford, 2020 ). Gender diverse people are extremely vulnerable to stigmatization, victimization, neglect, violence, and sexual abuse (Banbury, 2004 ; Beck, 2014 ; Jenness and Fenstermaker, 2016 ; Malkin & DeJong, 2018 ; Oparah, 2012 ; Stein et al., 2020). This systemic sex-segregated rigidity often fails to keep TGD people safe and may impede access to gender-affirming health care (Stohr, 2015 ).…”
Section: Chapter 11 Institutional Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The separation of people based on sex assigned at birth, a policy almost universally implemented in institutional settings (Brown and McDuffie, 2009 ; Routh et al., 2017), can create an inherently dangerous environment (Ledesma & Ford, 2020 ). Gender diverse people are extremely vulnerable to stigmatization, victimization, neglect, violence, and sexual abuse (Banbury, 2004 ; Beck, 2014 ; Jenness and Fenstermaker, 2016 ; Malkin & DeJong, 2018 ; Oparah, 2012 ; Stein et al., 2020). This systemic sex-segregated rigidity often fails to keep TGD people safe and may impede access to gender-affirming health care (Stohr, 2015 ).…”
Section: Chapter 11 Institutional Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The curiosity of the Other denotes a marked departure from a space where trans are at risk, where trans women “engage in unwanted sex as a way of bargaining in the ‘survival economy’ in prison” (Jenness, Sexton and Sumner, 2019: 621) and use their body as a commodity with other incarcerated persons or prison officers to survive their prison sentence, to gain protection, to be free from various forms of punishment and victimization, for food, canteen and other commissary items (Jenness, Sexton and Sumner, 2019; Mogul, Ritchie and Whitlock, 2011; Oparah, 2012). Here, Sandra negotiates an alternative carceral space where the term queen and its embodiment in this incarcerated trans space, ultimately subverts the rule of law, which dictates “queen” as criminal.…”
Section: Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…use of a person's birth name as opposed to chosen name) (Brömdal et al, 2019b; Clark et al, 2017; Halliwell et al ., 2022; Lydon et al ., 2015; National Center for Transgender Equality, 2018; Tadros et al, 2020; Van Hout et al, 2020; White Hughto et al ., 2018). Cisnormative policies, practices and a hypermasculine carceral culture constrain incarcerated trans persons’ embodiment of gender, constructing particular and normative ways of knowing trans (Jenness and Fenstermaker, 2014; Jenness and Gerlinger, 2020; Musto, 2019; Oparah, 2012; Pemberton, 2013; Robinson, 2011; Rodgers et al, 2017; Rosenberg and Oswin, 2015; Rosenberg, 2017; Smith, 2014; White Hughto et al ., 2018; Wilson et al, 2017).…”
Section: Lived Experiences Of Trans Incarcerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The separation of people based on sex assigned at birth, a policy almost universally implemented in institutional settings (Brown and McDuffie, 2009;Routh et al, 2017), can create an inherently dangerous environment (Ledesma & Ford, 2020). Gender diverse people are extremely vulnerable to stigmatization, victimization, neglect, violence, and sexual abuse (Banbury, 2004;Beck, 2014;Jenness and Fenstermaker, 2016;Malkin & DeJong, 2018;Oparah, 2012;Stein et al, 2020). This systemic sex-segregated rigidity often fails to keep TGD people safe and may impede access to gender-affirming health care (Stohr, 2015).…”
Section: Statement 117mentioning
confidence: 99%