2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11199-011-9985-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feminism and Evolutionary Psychology: Allies, Adversaries, or Both? An Introduction to a Special Issue

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, the weaknesses of the SST (Fausto-Sterling, 2000; Contratto, 2002; Pedersen et al, 2011; Smiler, 2011) led Buss and Schmitt to stress the limits of their theory and the nuances of its preconditions and conclusions (Buss and Schmitt, 2011). Quite polemically and from their perspective as evolutionary psychologists, they emphasized that they do not regard gender-typical behavior as ahistoric, but instead as flexible and context-dependent (Buss and Schmitt, 2011; Smith and Konik, 2011). …”
Section: Mental and Cultural Scriptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the weaknesses of the SST (Fausto-Sterling, 2000; Contratto, 2002; Pedersen et al, 2011; Smiler, 2011) led Buss and Schmitt to stress the limits of their theory and the nuances of its preconditions and conclusions (Buss and Schmitt, 2011). Quite polemically and from their perspective as evolutionary psychologists, they emphasized that they do not regard gender-typical behavior as ahistoric, but instead as flexible and context-dependent (Buss and Schmitt, 2011; Smith and Konik, 2011). …”
Section: Mental and Cultural Scriptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2011, Sex Roles published a Special Issue entitled 'Feminism and Evolutionary Psychology: Allies, Adversaries, or Both?' In their introduction to the volume, editors Christine Smith and Julie Konik (2011) retrace the acrimonious history between feminism and EP, while also signaling the possibility of a more conciliatory relationship between the two fields emerging.…”
Section: King's College Londonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Sexual Strategies Theory is one of the most widely applied theories of attraction and mate selection, it has also been the subject of critique (Pedersen et al 2011; Smith and Konik 2011). The criticisms most relevant to this study are that it has received little testing outside of undergraduate populations in the U.S. and Europe or with members of racial minorities (Smiler 2011).…”
Section: Body Weight and Partner Preferences Among African Americans:mentioning
confidence: 99%