2017
DOI: 10.32473/jpic.v1.i2.p116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Feminazis,” “libtards,” “snowflakes,” and “racists”: Trolling and the Spiral of Silence effect in women, LGBTQIA communities, and disability populations before and after the 2016 election

Abstract: Using a Qualtrics survey of 338 Twitter and Facebook users, the authors explore the effect that the 2016 U.S. presidential election had on people’s political posts both before and after the election and whether or not people actually experienced harassment and threats during the election cycle. If trolling causes people—particularly women, LGBTQIA community members, and people who identify with a disability—to censor themselves because they feel their opinion is in the minority or that they will be attacked fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these are mainly concerned with verifying that the main mechanism of the spiral of silence actually exists, namely people self-censoring in face of a perceived opposing opinion climate. While there are some studies on the spiral of silence that explicitly mention communities (Salwen et al 1994 ; Carter Olson and LaPoe 2017 ), they mostly focus on few, separate communities and not the interaction between multiple of them.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these are mainly concerned with verifying that the main mechanism of the spiral of silence actually exists, namely people self-censoring in face of a perceived opposing opinion climate. While there are some studies on the spiral of silence that explicitly mention communities (Salwen et al 1994 ; Carter Olson and LaPoe 2017 ), they mostly focus on few, separate communities and not the interaction between multiple of them.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%