2001
DOI: 10.1080/13218710109525003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Females who sexually abuse children: Assessment and treatment issues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
38
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The male-coerced category has been further developed by Nathan and Ward (2001) to include compliant victim, rejected/revengeful, and willing/ally subgroups. Here, Nathan and Ward distinguish between motivations that reflect either an exaggerated dependency on males, or feelings of rejection by a child itself or a male partner in favor of a child.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The male-coerced category has been further developed by Nathan and Ward (2001) to include compliant victim, rejected/revengeful, and willing/ally subgroups. Here, Nathan and Ward distinguish between motivations that reflect either an exaggerated dependency on males, or feelings of rejection by a child itself or a male partner in favor of a child.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to develop effective multifactorial theories researchers require an adequate and convincing set of research studies highlighting the characteristics and attendant clinical features of the population in question (Ward & Hudson, 1998). While research examining female sexual offenders has increased substantially over the past decade, our research knowledge of female sexual offenders has lagged significantly behind that held for their male counterparts Nathan & Ward, 2001). Consequently, theorists have not had access to the critical amount of rigorous research required to construct a convincing comprehensive theory of the multiple factors involved in the etiology of female sexual offending.…”
Section: Descriptive Model Of Female Sexual Offendingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In light of this general issue, professionals have sought to identify key factors that might explain and distinguish women's FEMALE SEXUAL OFFENDER PATHWAYS 4 4 sexual offending from that of their male counterparts. Key female sexual offender characteristics highlighted in the literature are previous victimization in the form of childhood and adulthood trauma (Grayston & De Luca, 1999;Johansson-Love & Fremouw, 2006), mental health issues (Grayston & De Luca, 1999;Nathan & Ward, 2001), and dependency .…”
Section: Descriptive Model Of Female Sexual Offendingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, previous researchers identified many women in this study who met the criteria for nurturers (Mathews et al, 1989;Sarrel & Masters, 1982;Vandiver & Kercher, 2004). Three of the women in this study described forming an intimate relationship with a teenage male, which is similar to the nurturers category (Mathews et al, 1989;Mayer, 1992;McCarty, 1986;Nathan & Ward, 2001;Syed & Williams, 1996;Vandiver & Kercher, 2004). 4 Two of the women interviewed had similar characteristics to those identified as having an incestuous relationship (Mathews et al, 1989;Mayer, 1992;McCarty, 1986;Sarrel & Masters, 1982;Vandiver & Kercher, 2004); these women were accused of molesting their children or stepchildren.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%