2020
DOI: 10.32890/mmj.24.2020.9921
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Females in Governance and Corporate Tax Avoidance: The Moderating Effect of Accounting Conservatism

Abstract: High cash outflow in the form of corporate taxes reduces the corporate firms’ liquidity, available funds for re-investment and growth opportunities. Corporate firms’ attention is therefore geared towards ensuring minimum tax liability. The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of females’ presence in the governance on corporate tax avoidance, moderating for the role of accounting conservatism. The study is based on the companies listed on the Nigerian Stock Exchange and utilised the ex-post factor res… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is consistent with findings by Christain, et al (2022), Phapho et al (2020), andMohammed et al (2019) who argued that in a large board, management decisions are subject to greater level of inspection from more directors with greater diversity in expertise and thus enhancing conservative reporting. However, there were other empirical works with contrary findings (Chatterjee & Chanchal, 2021;Saeed, 2020;Nasr & Ntim, 2018, Onyedokun & Salisu, 2018, Suleiman, 2014Jarboui, 2013). In their different investigations of the effect of the components of corporate governance mechanism on accounting conservatism, they were unanimous in reporting the existence of negative reporting a negative causal link between board size and conservative reporting, arguing that an increase in board size may create agency problems as some directors may tag along as free riders and the large size may become too cumbersome for the CEO to manage.…”
Section: Board Size and Accounting Conservatismmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result is consistent with findings by Christain, et al (2022), Phapho et al (2020), andMohammed et al (2019) who argued that in a large board, management decisions are subject to greater level of inspection from more directors with greater diversity in expertise and thus enhancing conservative reporting. However, there were other empirical works with contrary findings (Chatterjee & Chanchal, 2021;Saeed, 2020;Nasr & Ntim, 2018, Onyedokun & Salisu, 2018, Suleiman, 2014Jarboui, 2013). In their different investigations of the effect of the components of corporate governance mechanism on accounting conservatism, they were unanimous in reporting the existence of negative reporting a negative causal link between board size and conservative reporting, arguing that an increase in board size may create agency problems as some directors may tag along as free riders and the large size may become too cumbersome for the CEO to manage.…”
Section: Board Size and Accounting Conservatismmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Consistent with the findings of this study. Christian, et al (2020), Phapho et al (2020), El-habashy (2019), Mohammed et al (2019), Nasr and Ntim (2018), Suleiman (2014), Salami (2014 and Jarboui (2013) all reported that board independence has positive and significant trade-off with conservative reporting. Inconsistent with the findings from the evidence provided in the present work, Suleiman et al (2020) used accounting quality as a proxy for accounting conservatism and found a negative and insignificant causal link between them.…”
Section: Board Independence and Accounting Conservatismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following this line of research, recent studies provide evidence that executives face different consequences for adopting different taxation strategies. Suleiman (2020) shows that CEOs and directors are rewarded by increasing the number of outside boards of directors for being tax-aggressive. Through CEO characteristics, management can observe the costs and benefits of implementing such tax strategies, understand that they are ultimately accountable to shareholders, and embrace maximizing shareholder wealth, therefore being aggressive in tax avoidance.…”
Section: Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that women CEOs have lower debt ratios, more stable company profits, and a higher chance of surviving than male CEOs in similar companies. On the other hand, a low debt level indicates a company's underinvestment so that it can reduce the company's value in the future (Suleiman 2020;Kountur, Djohanputro, and Sari 2021). Even low debt will improve earnings management (Amelia and Mulya 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dengan adanya hasil penelitian tersebut maka hipotesis pertama (H1) ditolak. Hasil penelitian ini berbeda dengan beberapa peneliti lain seperti Rahimipour (2017), Rhee et al, (2020), Riguen et al, (2019), Sudirjo (2020) dan Suleiman (2020) Pengaruh signifikan negatif komite audit terhadap penghindaran pajak dalam penelitian ini dapat diterima. Hasil uji hipotesis menunjukkan nilai 0.0281 dengan nilai koefisien -0.0131 yang berarti menyatakan adanya hubungan yang signifikan negatif antara komite audit dengan penghindaran pajak.…”
Section: Pembahasanunclassified