2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-72592-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Female sex as an independent prognostic factor in the development of oral mucositis during autologous peripheral stem cell transplantation

Abstract: Oral mucositis (OM) is a frequent complication of stem cell transplantation-associated toxicity in haematological malignancies, contributing to mortality. Therapy still remains mainly supportive. We assessed risk factors in retrospective analysis of 192 autologous peripheral stem cell transplantation patients with lymphoma and multiple myeloma (MM), respectively. Futhermore, we examined the hormone levels both in serum and saliva during transplantation in 7 postmenopausal female patients with lymphoma compared… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sonkodi et al attributed the sex difference in the occurrence of NC-ACL injury to the NGF-TrkA signaling axis on proprioceptive sensory neuron terminals, which is the suggested locus of the primary microinjury of this dichotomous non-contact injury mechanism (Sonkodi et al 2021b ). The current authors suggest that the excessively elevated PGE2 levels might explain the phenomenon that females are more prone to DED and presumably to other mucosal dryness syndromes, as was demonstrated by Gebri et al (Gebri et al 2020 ). In the pre-ovulatory phase of the menstrual cycle, when a marked elevation of estrogen is due to luteinizing hormone (LH) (Sonkodi et al 2021b ), LH also stimulates the NGF-TrkA axis through interleukin-1β in the ovarian cells and promotes TrkA and NGF gene expression and PGE2 release (Dissen et al 1996 ).…”
Section: Sex Difference: Female Sex As a Risk Factorsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Sonkodi et al attributed the sex difference in the occurrence of NC-ACL injury to the NGF-TrkA signaling axis on proprioceptive sensory neuron terminals, which is the suggested locus of the primary microinjury of this dichotomous non-contact injury mechanism (Sonkodi et al 2021b ). The current authors suggest that the excessively elevated PGE2 levels might explain the phenomenon that females are more prone to DED and presumably to other mucosal dryness syndromes, as was demonstrated by Gebri et al (Gebri et al 2020 ). In the pre-ovulatory phase of the menstrual cycle, when a marked elevation of estrogen is due to luteinizing hormone (LH) (Sonkodi et al 2021b ), LH also stimulates the NGF-TrkA axis through interleukin-1β in the ovarian cells and promotes TrkA and NGF gene expression and PGE2 release (Dissen et al 1996 ).…”
Section: Sex Difference: Female Sex As a Risk Factorsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Data on gender impact on OM are not homogeneous. The majority of papers reported a higher risk for OM development in female patients [16][17][18]. The hormonal status could play an important role; it is well known how hormonal post-translational modifications could enhance the risk of cytotoxicity and OM [19].…”
Section: Patient-related Confounding Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be because females tend to be smaller and if chemotherapy is calculated with body surface area they generally receive a higher dose per kg. Another explanation maybe the negative effects of female sex hormones as pointed out in a recent study [5]. The gender difference in the incidence of grade 2 to 4 OM was not statistically signi cant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…As all patients underwent the same treatment, the effect of treatmentrelated risk factors was minimised. Female gender has been consistently reported as a patient-related risk factor [5][6][7]. This could be because females tend to be smaller and if chemotherapy is calculated with body surface area they generally receive a higher dose per kg.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation