2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-012-1413-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Female preferences for spectral call properties in the western genetic lineage of Cope's gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis)

Abstract: Female frogs discriminate among potential mates based on individual variation in male advertisement calls. While considerable data have accumulated allowing comparisons of female preference functions among species, we still lack fundamental knowledge about how and why the shapes of preference functions for particular call properties vary among populations within all but a few species. Here, we report results from a study aimed at describing female preference functions for spectral call properties in Cope’s gra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
15
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
5
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We chose frequencies of 1.3 and 2.6 kHz for two reasons. First, they are close to the average frequencies present in the bimodal spectrum of male advertisement calls in our study populations (Schrode et al 2012). Second, according to the “matched filter hypothesis” of anuran hearing (Capranica and Moffat 1983), they are presumed to be encoded primarily by the amphibian papilla (AP) and the basilar papilla (BP), respectively (Hillery 1984b; Gerhardt 2005).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…We chose frequencies of 1.3 and 2.6 kHz for two reasons. First, they are close to the average frequencies present in the bimodal spectrum of male advertisement calls in our study populations (Schrode et al 2012). Second, according to the “matched filter hypothesis” of anuran hearing (Capranica and Moffat 1983), they are presumed to be encoded primarily by the amphibian papilla (AP) and the basilar papilla (BP), respectively (Hillery 1984b; Gerhardt 2005).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…By comparison with H. cinerea , spectral sensitivity and frequency selectivity have been less well studied in H. chrysoscelis and H. versicolor . What information is available for these two species, however, is entirely consistent with general patterns demonstrated for H. cinerea and other frogs (Bee, 2010; Gerhardt, 2005; Gerhardt and Huber, 2002; Gerhardt et al, 2007; Hillery, 1984; Schrode et al, 2012; Schrode et al, in review).…”
Section: Brief Primer On Frog Hearingsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Angles of 0° and 180° correspond, respectively, to the rostral and caudal ends of the midline. All frequencies fell within the audible range of H. chrysoscelis (Hillery 1984; Schrode et al 2014), and frequencies of 1,250 and 2,500 Hz correspond to the two peaks present in the bimodal spectrum of male advertisement calls in our study population (Schrode et al 2012). Signal levels between 76 and 94 dB are within the range of call amplitudes likely experienced in breeding choruses (Gerhardt 1975).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 64%