2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2019.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Female mate choice significantly increases captive breeding success, and scents can be frozen to determine choice, in the stripe-faced dunnart

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, this type of work has focused on mammals, such as captive harvest mice, pygmy loris' and striped face dunnarts. In these species, male olfactory cues (scent markings) have been used to manipulate female preferences and determine optimal pairings in captivity (Fisher et al, 2003;Roberts and Gosling, 2004;Parrott et al, 2019). Whether similar approaches can be taken with anurans is an exciting avenue for future research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To date, this type of work has focused on mammals, such as captive harvest mice, pygmy loris' and striped face dunnarts. In these species, male olfactory cues (scent markings) have been used to manipulate female preferences and determine optimal pairings in captivity (Fisher et al, 2003;Roberts and Gosling, 2004;Parrott et al, 2019). Whether similar approaches can be taken with anurans is an exciting avenue for future research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One reason for this may be that natural mate choice behavior is rarely permitted; either due to a lack of information on the reproductive behavior of a target species, and/or, mate choice is restricted in favor of genetic targets (Asa et al, 2011;Martin-Wintle et al, 2019). Recent work has demonstrated that integrating mate choice into captive breeding protocols can significantly increase behavioral compatibility between mates, resulting in higher mating and reproductive success, and elevated offspring survival post-release (Petrie, 1994;Martin-Wintle et al, 2015;Hartnett et al, 2018;Parrott et al, 2019). Thus, research investigating patterns of female mate choice (including individual variation) in threatened species has real potential to improve captive breeding outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Female mate choice is a strong evolutionary factor that can have significant consequences for female fitness (Andersson 1994;Rosenthal 2017). By preferentially mating with certain males, females can significantly improve their reproductive success, as well as the fitness of their offspring (Petrie 1994;Martin-Wintle et al 2015;Hartnett et al 2018;Parrott et al 2019). In resource-based mating systems, where males provide resources essential for reproduction, females can obtain a combination of both direct and genetic benefits from their mating decisions, as these benefits are not mutually exclusive (Candolin 2003;Bussière et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much of the current literature on mate choice in conservation contexts focuses on experimental pairing trials. In pairing trials, an animal is housed with a test individual of the opposite sex, with behavioral indicators and/or reproductive outcomes used to determine whether the pairing is preferred or nonpreferred (e.g., Hartnett, Parrott, Mulder, Coulson, & Magrath, 2018; Martin‐Wintle et al., 2015; Parrott, Nation, & Selwood, 2019). Other studies compare the breeding success of pairings with varying genetic characteristics (Brandies, Grueber, Ivy, Hogg, & Belov, 2018; Parrott, Ward, & Temple‐Smith, 2006; Parrott, Ward, Temple‐Smith, & Selwood, 2015; Russell et al., 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%