2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Female mate attraction in ornate tree lizards, Urosaurus ornatus: a multivariate analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
65
1
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
65
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Mate-choice studies of lizards were also rare, though perhaps justifiably so: a recent review of mate choice in lizards suggests that females in many species simply do not attend to exaggerated male display traits in mate choice (e.g. Olsson and Madsen 1995;Tokarz 1995; but see Hamilton and Sullivan 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mate-choice studies of lizards were also rare, though perhaps justifiably so: a recent review of mate choice in lizards suggests that females in many species simply do not attend to exaggerated male display traits in mate choice (e.g. Olsson and Madsen 1995;Tokarz 1995; but see Hamilton and Sullivan 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Larger males have better territories and, perhaps as a consequence, exhibit better ability to hold harems. Indeed, female preference for larger males has been reported in various lizard species (Cooper and Vitt 1993, Wikelski et al 1996, Calsbeek and Sinervo 2002b, although there are also several lizard species where females' choice is not observed Madsen 1995, Hamilton andSullivan 2005). Female T. torquatus can be actually attracted by the high-quality territories that are secured by larger males (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the decision tree analysis to examine the degree of influence each male trait had on female association, an important question that cannot be answered simply by manipulating individual traits (Hamilton and Sullivan 2005). Because the male traits in this study were often highly correlated, we performed a principal components analysis of the significant traits with a correlation matrix to obtain a single measure (principal component 1, PC1) of overall "quality."…”
Section: Decision Tree Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Association is a good indicator of the female's likelihood of mating with each male if given the opportunity (Walling et al 2010) and is used widely as a proxy for female mate choice in lizards (Sigmund 1983;Olsson and Madsen 1995;Smith and Zucker 1997;Lebas and Marshall 2001;Olsson et al 2003;Hamilton and Sullivan 2005;Lailvaux and Irschick 2006;Bajer et al 2010). At the end of each trial, we designated the male with the highest association time as "preferred" and the other male as "nonpreferred".…”
Section: Female Associationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation