1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9924(99)00003-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Female juvenile delinquents' pragmatic awareness of conversational interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contradictory patterns of communication were observed throughout the 5-month study. These contradictions were similar to findings from a previous qualitative study conducted on 45 incarcerated teenage girls (Sanger, Hux, & Ritzman, 1999). In that study, researchers reported that participants could state many of the conventions governing conversational interactions but appeared to openly violate conventions governing ongoing conversations.…”
supporting
confidence: 83%
“…Contradictory patterns of communication were observed throughout the 5-month study. These contradictions were similar to findings from a previous qualitative study conducted on 45 incarcerated teenage girls (Sanger, Hux, & Ritzman, 1999). In that study, researchers reported that participants could state many of the conventions governing conversational interactions but appeared to openly violate conventions governing ongoing conversations.…”
supporting
confidence: 83%
“…Sanger and co-workers have also carried out a number of investigations into the language skills of female juvenile delinquents (e.g. Sanger et al, 1997Sanger et al, , 1999Sanger et al, , 2000, however gender differences in language development in general (see Gleason, 2002) and in the relationship of impaired language development to disruptive behaviour (e.g. Stowe et al, 1999) limit the extent to which the findings from these studies can be generalised to male juvenile offenders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many incarcerated youth tend to demonstrate poor pragmatic practices, in actuality, a much smaller number present with language problems. It can be argued that in the aforementioned study by Sanger et al (1999), many youth, irrespective of their level of knowledge of communication practices, were making &dquo;poor choices&dquo; during ongoing interactions. Depending on the nature of the situation, students who make &dquo;poor choices&dquo; in schools most often are subject to disciplinary action, such as detention, suspension, Saturday school, transfer, or expulsion.…”
Section: Teenage Delinquent Girls'mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…A second major finding of the Sanger research review related to pragmatic practices examined in a qualitative study involving 45 adolescent girls residing in a correctional facility (Sanger, Hux, & Ritzman, 1999). During interactions with the teenagers in small-group settings and 40-minute class periods over 3 weeks, researchers found that many girls were aware of the practices and rules that regulated conversational interactions.…”
Section: Teenage Delinquent Girls'mentioning
confidence: 99%