2014
DOI: 10.1155/2014/205230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Female Genital Mutilation and Obstetric Outcomes: Flawed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Does Not Accurately Reflect the Available Evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With respect to obstetric outcomes and postpartum perineal re‐education, 24 references were identified (Table ): 16 research studies; five clinical guidelines; one expert opinion; one policy statement; and one letter to the editor . On defibulation performed outside of pregnancy or labour, nine references were identified: four research articles; one guideline; three expert opinions; and one case report .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With respect to obstetric outcomes and postpartum perineal re‐education, 24 references were identified (Table ): 16 research studies; five clinical guidelines; one expert opinion; one policy statement; and one letter to the editor . On defibulation performed outside of pregnancy or labour, nine references were identified: four research articles; one guideline; three expert opinions; and one case report .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies conducted in Africa have shown that FGM is associated with increased risks of caesarean section, postpartum haemorrhage, episiotomy, extended maternal hospital stay, resuscitation of the infant, low‐birthweight infant, and inpatient perinatal death . Studies performed in Western settings, however, suggest that a high standard of obstetric care (e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the adverse maternal obstetric outcomes associated with FGM were: increased risk of cesarean section, episiotomy, prolonged labor, perineal tears. Several studies have revealed similar adverse outcomes in these FGM victims [15,[20][21][22][23][24][25]. This may be explained by the fact that following FGM, the scar tissue which is less elastic than the normal perineal and vaginal tissue might cause differing degrees of obstruction leading to tears or episiotomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This is our response to Meirik, Banks, Farley, Akande, Bathija, and Ali's letter to the editor from March 2015 [ 1 ], where they comment on our paper “The Obstetric Consequences of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis” [ 2 ] and a linked technical report. Unfortunately, we were not informed about their letter; hence our response was late.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%