2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Female CEOs and green innovation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 131 publications
1
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Joecks et al, 2023;Qu et al, 2021). There are lots of factors that currently affect corporate green innovation performance, including the management (Chen et al, 2023;Javed et al, 2023), enterprises themselves (Knott & Vieregger, 2020;Wang, 2019;Yang & Chen, 2023), the government (Wang & Wang, 2021;Yin et al, 2022), and so on. Nowadays, with the increasing frequency and intensity of extreme weather events and the occurrence of global warming, the fragility of climate change is gradually becoming prominent, which has caused huge economic losses (Ahmad et al, 2023;Huang et al, 2018Huang et al, , 2022.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Joecks et al, 2023;Qu et al, 2021). There are lots of factors that currently affect corporate green innovation performance, including the management (Chen et al, 2023;Javed et al, 2023), enterprises themselves (Knott & Vieregger, 2020;Wang, 2019;Yang & Chen, 2023), the government (Wang & Wang, 2021;Yin et al, 2022), and so on. Nowadays, with the increasing frequency and intensity of extreme weather events and the occurrence of global warming, the fragility of climate change is gradually becoming prominent, which has caused huge economic losses (Ahmad et al, 2023;Huang et al, 2018Huang et al, , 2022.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By utilizing new concepts and technologies to achieve environmental pollution reduction and resource consumption savings and bringing the corresponding economic benefits (Yin et al, 2022), green innovation is also one of the ways to improve the sustainable competitive advantage of enterprises (Briest et al, 2020; Chatzoglou & Chatzoudes, 2017; Joecks et al, 2023; Qu et al, 2021). There are lots of factors that currently affect corporate green innovation performance, including the management (Chen et al, 2023; Javed et al, 2023), enterprises themselves (Knott & Vieregger, 2020; Wang, 2019; Yang & Chen, 2023), the government (Wang & Wang, 2021; Yin et al, 2022), and so on. Nowadays, with the increasing frequency and intensity of extreme weather events and the occurrence of global warming, the fragility of climate change is gradually becoming prominent, which has caused huge economic losses (Ahmad et al, 2023; Huang et al, 2018, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Institutional theory highlights the promotion of policies (such as green taxation, supervision, and regulations) on environmental innovation, and informal institutional theory underlines the influence of corporate culture and environmental ethics (Qi et al, 2021; Weng et al, 2021). Upper echelons theory proposes that the demographic characteristics and cognition of executives, CEOs, and other managers shape their decision‐making preferences, thereby affecting firms' environmental innovation decisions (Arena et al, 2018; Javed et al, 2023). Finally, social responsibility and time orientation also influence firms' environmental innovation to some extent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surface-level characteristics act as a stand-in for cognitive resources and personal, difficult to discern, characteristics (Jackson et al , 1995; Soleimani and Stauffer, 2022; Wang et al , 2022). For instance, research using upper echelons theory has demonstrated linkages between the demographic characteristics of a firm’s leaders and organizational decisions and outcomes (Finkelstein et al , 1996; Javed et al , 2023; Roberson and Hyeon, 2007; Schumann et al , 2023). In line with this stream of thinking, race and gender have often been used in diversity research as proxies for differences in perspectives and human capital (Hillman et al , 2002; Kolev and McNamara, 2020; Roh and Sung, 2022).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%