2003
DOI: 10.1300/j014v24n04_01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Female Candidate Success in Runoff Primaries

Abstract: This paper explores the impact of the runoff primary on women's success in gaining nominations for statewide and local offices in a single state. It relies on data from a generation of primaries to test the Jackson-Smeal proposition that runoff elections disadvantage women. This intensive examination allows us to control for the political context, yet map the changes associated with the maturing of female candidacies in a traditionalistic political culture. When controls for incumbency status and success in th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research on the differential effects of appointment and election are part of a larger literature on how candidate-selection mechanisms interact with gender (Bullock and Maggiotto 2003; Fiber-Ostrow 2012). Previous studies have seen a variety of relationships between primary elections and women’s success in obtaining nominations.…”
Section: Theory and Previous Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on the differential effects of appointment and election are part of a larger literature on how candidate-selection mechanisms interact with gender (Bullock and Maggiotto 2003; Fiber-Ostrow 2012). Previous studies have seen a variety of relationships between primary elections and women’s success in obtaining nominations.…”
Section: Theory and Previous Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%