1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf00164123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Female-biased sex allocation in peregrine falcons and other raptors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
65
2
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
5
65
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Treecreepers lack clear secondary sexual traits that could serve as ornaments and are visible to human beings and all the traits of the male parents measured were unrelated to any variations in the sex ratio. It is thought that sex ratio can also change over the breeding season (Dijkstra et al 1990;Bednarz & Hayden 1991;Olsen & Cockburn 1991;Zijlstra et al 1992;Daan et al 1996); however, in our data such a relationship was not found. In summary, we found that habitat quality as measured by habitat structure was associated with a high level of variation in the primary brood sex ratio.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 91%
“…Treecreepers lack clear secondary sexual traits that could serve as ornaments and are visible to human beings and all the traits of the male parents measured were unrelated to any variations in the sex ratio. It is thought that sex ratio can also change over the breeding season (Dijkstra et al 1990;Bednarz & Hayden 1991;Olsen & Cockburn 1991;Zijlstra et al 1992;Daan et al 1996); however, in our data such a relationship was not found. In summary, we found that habitat quality as measured by habitat structure was associated with a high level of variation in the primary brood sex ratio.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 91%
“…The long-term and inclusive fitness effects of the BSR are still unknown and experimental work in this area is urgently required (see also Komdeur & Pen 2002). Nager et al 1999;(31) Nishiumi 1998;(32) Nishiumi et al 1996;(33) Oddie 2000;(34) Olsen & Cockburn 1991;(35) Patterson et al 1980;(36) Sheldon et al 1997;(37) Sheldon et al 1999;(38) Smallwood & Smallwood 1998;(39) Svensson & Nilsson 1996;(40) Teather 1987;(41) Teather & Weatherhead 1988;(42) Tella et al 1996;(43) Torres & Drummond 1999;(44) Weatherhead 1983;(45) Weimerskirch et al 2000;(46) Westerdahl et al 1997;(47) Westerdahl et al 2000;(48) Wiebe & Bortolotti 1992;(49) Zijlstra et al 1992. ( †Theoretical studies.…”
Section: How To Investigate Adaptive Bsr Manipulation In Relation To mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nestlings of large sex out-compete small sex for parental care prediction: (i) a consistently small-sex biased primary sex ratio to compensate for their higher nestling mortality (ii) a bias in favour of nestlings of the large sex during favourable conditions, e.g. high parental and/or territory quality (Olsen & Cockburn 1991) (iii) broods with all chicks of same sex (Newton 1986;Olsen & Cockburn 1991;Heinsohn et al 1997 Emlen et al 1986) (b) groups with (several) helpers already present prediction:…”
Section: Bsr Manipulation Under Different Patterns Of Parental Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…of raptors have demonstrated biased sex allocation with respect to laying date (Dijkstra et al 1990;Olsen & Cockburn 1991;Zijlstra et al 1992;Daan et al 1996), laying sequences within broods (Bortolotti 1986;Edwards et al 1988;Bednarz & Hayden 1991;Leroux & Bretagnolle 1996) and maternal condition (Wiebe & Bortolotti 1992). Although these studies explained adaptive sex ratio manipulation at the individual level, they also reported overall male-biased sex ratios of nestlings or fledglings at the population level, with the except of one study (Dijkstra et al 1990).…”
Section: Other Important Investigationsmentioning
confidence: 99%