2010
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.0937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Female and male genetic contributions to post-mating immune defence in female Drosophila melanogaster

Abstract: Post-mating reduction in immune defence is common in female insects, and a trade-off between mating and immunity could affect the evolution of immunity. In this work, we tested the capacity of virgin and mated female Drosophila melanogaster to defend against infection by four bacterial pathogens. We found that female D. melanogaster suffer post-mating immunosuppression in a pathogen-dependent manner. The effect of mating was seen after infection with two bacterial pathogens (Providencia rettgeri and Providenci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
94
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(56 reference statements)
5
94
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Drosophila immunity studies are somewhat divided between the two inoculation sites. In some studies pathogens are injected into the abdomen (24,26,(36)(37)(38)(39), and in others they are injected into the thorax (16,(40)(41)(42)(43), while many published papers do not report the site of infection at all. This procedural variance illustrates the general belief that site of inoculation is relatively unimportant to output phenotypes-a belief that is strongly contradicted by our current data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drosophila immunity studies are somewhat divided between the two inoculation sites. In some studies pathogens are injected into the abdomen (24,26,(36)(37)(38)(39), and in others they are injected into the thorax (16,(40)(41)(42)(43), while many published papers do not report the site of infection at all. This procedural variance illustrates the general belief that site of inoculation is relatively unimportant to output phenotypes-a belief that is strongly contradicted by our current data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(b) Immune treatments The severity of infection on host fitness is largely pathogendependent, where different species of closely related organisms can have different impacts on host survival and reproductive success [21]. Instead of using a dense array of pathogens to determine the extent to which each species influenced male reproductive behaviour (which was logistically unfeasible), we inoculated males with lipopolysaccharide (LPS).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, our gradient consisted of LPS . The maximum dose was set by the saturation point of LPS in insect Ringer's solution, which was 50 mg ml 21 (beyond which LPS failed to stay in solution). Therefore, six doses were constructed: 0 mg (control), 0.01, 0.1, 1.0, 10 and 50 mg of LPS.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that M. anisopliae infection of some dipteran species may occur more readily if conidia can germinate internally. The lower survival time in female M. domestica infected with M. anisopliae may also be due to a post-mating reduction in immune defence [38][39][40] . Only newly emerged (1-2 day old) flies were used in the transmission assay, however, sufficient mating may have occurred during this time and caused the difference in survival time.…”
Section: Accepted Articlementioning
confidence: 99%