Fellowship Training Objectives and Readings in Consultation-Liaison Transplantation Psychiatry

Riether, Anne Marie; Lewison, Barbara; Cohen-Cole, Steven A.; Surman, Owen S.; Wolcott, Deane L.; Andrykowski, Michael A.; Lesko, Lynna M.

doi:10.1016/s0033-3182(92)71963-x

Cited by 7 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In an effort to provide appropriate comparison groups within organ systems, normative data on commonly used measures of cognitive functioning, affective status, psychosocial adjustment, coping, quality of life, and life satisfaction have recently been published for liver, cardiac, kidney, and bone marrow transplant candidates (Baker, Marcellus, Zabora, Polland, & Jodrey, 1997; DeShields, McDonough, Mannen, & Miller, 1996; Greco, Brickman, & Routh, 1996; Hecker, Norvell, & Hills, 1989; Putzke et al, 1997; Sears, Rodrigue, Sirois, Urizar, & Perri, 1999; Streisand et al, 1999; Trzepacz, Brenner, & Van Thiel, 1989; Triffaux et al, 2001). Although the movement toward establishing normative databases for the assessment of transplant candidates is promising, wide variation exists in the types of instruments used to assess the different domains of functioning in adults (Mori, Klein, & Gallagher, 1999; Riether, Lewison, & Cohen-Cole, 1992) and there is a pressing need to study the differential aspects of pretransplant evaluation in pediatric and adolescent patients (Shaw & Taussig, 1999).…”

Section: Psychological Evaluation Of Transplant Candidatesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychological assessment and care of organ transplant patients.

Olbrisch¹,

Benedict²,

Ashe³

et al. 2002

Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

173

150

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Organ transplant has been developed in animal models over the past 100 years. The major limiting factor in transplant medicine is the shortage of donor organs. This shortage creates pressure for fair and efficient allocation of organs, with expectations that those involved in transplantation will strive to achieve optimal outcomes and ensure just access. This article reviews the major types of transplants and the illnesses and behavioral comorbidities that lead to these procedures, the psychological assessment of transplant candidates, the adaptive tasks required of the transplant recipient at various stages of the transplant process, and relevant psychological interventions. Liaison with others on the transplant team and ethical issues of concern to psychologists who work with transplant patients, including living organ donors, are also discussed. Finally, new developments in transplant and suggestions for future psychological research in organ transplant are presented.

show abstract

Section: Psychological Evaluation Of Transplant Candidatesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychological assessment and care of organ transplant patients.

Olbrisch¹,

Benedict²,

Ashe³

et al. 2002

Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

173

150

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Clinical psychology. Clinical aspects of organ transplantation have addressed the plight of the organ recipient (see Beidel, 1987, for a review), psychosocial evaluation of transplant candidates (e.g., Levenson & Olbrisch, 1993;Surman & Purtilo, 1992), and the field of consultationliaison transplantation psychiatry (e.g., Riether et al, 1992). Our review highlights the need for clinical perspectives pertaining to various death coping mechanisms and decision coping strategies.…”

Section: Social Psychologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychological aspects of organ donation: A critical review and synthesis of individual and next-of-kin donation decisions.

Radecki¹,

Jaccard²

1997

Health Psychology

225

171

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article presents a critical review of psychological perspectives on organ donation. The review considers individual decisions to donate organs posthumously and next-of-kin consent decisions. A theoretical analysis of intention to donate is presented for both types of donation decisions, and the literature is reviewed within the context of the proposed framework. Donation decisions are examined as a function of attitude toward donation and the religious, cultural, altruistic, normative, and knowledge-based beliefs that comprise the attitude. Consent decisions are primarily influenced by prior knowledge of the deceased individual's wishes. An alternative conceptual model is offered to explain the basis of consent decisions in the absence of this knowledge. Suggestions are offered to improve measurement strategy and to guide theoretically based organ donation research within selected disciplines of psychology.

show abstract

Organ Transplantation Psychiatry

Wolcott¹

1993

Psychosomatics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Fellowship Training Objectives and Readings in Consultation-Liaison Transplantation Psychiatry

Cited by 7 publications

References 0 publications

Psychological assessment and care of organ transplant patients.

Psychological assessment and care of organ transplant patients.

Psychological aspects of organ donation: A critical review and synthesis of individual and next-of-kin donation decisions.

Organ Transplantation Psychiatry

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About