Fellow eye comparison between alcohol-assisted and single-step transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy: late mid-term outcomes

Abstract

Objective: To compare late mid-term results of two different surgical approaches of surface excimer laser ablation for myopic and astigmatic errors in contralateral eyes of the same patients. Methods: Prospective cohort study. A photorefractive keratectomy technique was performed on the right eye and single-step transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy on the left eye of the same patient, in 2012. Postoperative uncorrected and corrected visual acuities, manifest refraction, contrast sensitivity, objective scatter index, tear film stability assessed by serial measurements of objective scatter index and aberrometry as well as occurrence of haze, were compared between groups of eyes. Results: Thirty-two eyes of 16 patients with a mean time of follow-up of 35.2 +/ - 5.0 months (range 30-46 months) were evaluated. No significant differences were observed in postoperative results (visual acuity, spherical equivalent, defocus equivalent, higher-order aberrations, objective scatter index, tear film stability and contrast sensitivity). Contrast sensitivity tended to be better in transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy technique, under photopic lighting conditions without glare and mesopic conditions both with glare and without glare, however, no statistically significant differences were found. No eye presented corneal haze at the last examination. Conclusion: No statistically significant differences in visual acuity, refractive results, contrast sensitivity, objective scatter index, tear film stability or ocular aberrometry were observed between the two surface ablation techniques.

Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy Compared to Conventional Photorefractive Keratectomy: A Meta-Analysis

“…The included studies were each from Colombia [ 36 ], Lebanon [ 32 ], the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia [ 33 ], India [ 34 ], and Turkey [ 11 ]. There were 2 studies from Iran [ 29 , 30 ], 2 from Germany [ 31 , 35 ], and 3 studies from Egypt [ 29 , 37 , 38 ].…”

“…Data for this outcome were collected from 6 studies [ 29 , 30 , 36 ]. with continuous outcome reports.…”

“…e length of postoperative follow-up varied from 3.5 to 40 months. Table 1 contains the characteristics of the studies [11,[29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38]. Five studies [29,30,35,37].…”

“…is meta-analysis was performed for 10 studies [11,29,[31][32][33][36][37][38]. from the included studies with continuous outcomes, to compare the predictability nature (postoperative SE) of the two procedures under this study.…”

“…In this study, only 2 studies [29,38]. were a randomized, double-blinded trial and all other 11 studies [11,[29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37]. were nonrandomized studies.…”