Feiten en cijfers over de Nederlandse veehouderijsectoren 2018

Peet, Geert van der; Leenstra, F.R.; Vermeij, I.; Bondt, N.; Puister, Linda; Os, J. van

doi:10.18174/464128

Cited by 14 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The subset of farms that participated in the interviews had higher ADDD TOTAL , but their ADDD DCT was in line with the national data. In terms of herd size, AMS farms were larger and CMS farms smaller than the Dutch average herd size (regardless of AMS or CMS) of 97 cows at the time of the study (Van der Peet et al, 2018). The udder health variables of these 42 herds were comparable to what was reported for Dutch dairy farms in previous work (Nor et al, 2014;.…”

Section: Antimicrobial Usagesupporting

confidence: 52%

Antimicrobial use and farmers' attitude toward mastitis treatment on dairy farms with automatic or conventional milking systems

Deng

Lam

Hogeveen

et al. 2020

Journal of Dairy Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

components (PC) that explained 48% of the variation in all these variables. The AMS farms were not distinguished from CMS farms in the principal component space. The 3 PC represented different aspects of udder health, ADDD TOTAL , and treatment strategy. Differences in treatment strategy were unrelated to total antimicrobial usage or overall udder health. The distribution of mastitis-causing pathogens and their antimicrobial resistance were comparable between AMS and CMS farms. In conclusion, our study shows that AMU on AMS farms was similar to that of CMS farms, but AMS farmers tend to apply more injectable and fewer intramammary treatments during lactation than CMS farmers. Across both farm types, farmers' attitudes toward udder health in general and toward mastitis treatment are associated with AMU.

show abstract

Section: Antimicrobial Usagesupporting

confidence: 52%

Antimicrobial use and farmers' attitude toward mastitis treatment on dairy farms with automatic or conventional milking systems

Deng

Lam

Hogeveen

et al. 2020

Journal of Dairy Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It was assumed that half of the calves will be available for their meat (i.e., the male ones, ratio 1:2.375), and that the other female half will be fully used for replacement of the dairy herd. In fact, this percentage is somewhat higher, as an unknown minor part of the female calves is also available for their meat (39). Based on slaughter weight, the model calculates the quantity of edible meat per animal.…”

Section: Connecting Dairy Consumption To Dairy Herd Meat and Dairy Fats Consumptionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Figure 2 shows an example of the quantities related to the recommended portions of semi-skimmed milk and low-fat cheese per year for adults 19-50 years old: 109.5 L milk and 14.6 kg cheese. Dutch milk production per cow is calculated as on average 30,000 L per life span (39). A litre of semi-skimmed milk (1.5% fat) has a by-product of 33.8 g of butter, because cow milk has an average fat percentage of 4.1%.…”

Section: Connecting Dairy Consumption To Dairy Herd Meat and Dairy Fats Consumptionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Food System Approach for Sustainable Food-Based Dietary Guidelines: An Exploratory Scenario Study on Dutch Animal Food Products

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study explores interconnections between food consumption and production of animal (by-)products in different food system scenarios within the scope of Dutch Food-Based Dietary Guidelines (FBDG). For this scenario study, a Microsoft Excel model was created that include seven scenarios with different quantities of eggs, milk, cheese, beef cattle, broilers, and pigs as input. Number of animals, intake of energy, animal protein, saturated fatty acids (SFAs), trans-fatty acids (TFAs), salt, greenhouse gas emissions (GHGEs), and land use (LU) were calculated and compared with current consumption and reference values. Based on the concept of eating the whole animal, every recommended lean, unprocessed portion of beef comes along with a non-recommended portion of beef (two portions for pork, 0.5 portion for broilers). The reference values for SFAs, TFAs, and salt were not exceeded if the intake of meat is limited to 410 g/week. The scenarios with recommended 450 mL semi-skimmed milk and 40 g/day low-fat cheese results in 36 g/day of butter as by-product, exceeding its acceptable intake three times. The near-vegetarian scenario with recommended amounts of eggs, milk, and cheese, includes only a portion of beef/calf per 6 days and a portion of chicken per 9 weeks as by-products. This scenario more than halves the GHGE and LU. Finally, the scenario that included the maximum recommended amounts of animal products is reachable with half the current size of Dutch livestock. This conceptual framework may be useful in the discussion on how future sustainable FBDG can incorporate a more food system-based approach.

show abstract

“…Dairy farming is an essential part of the Dutch economy. Sixty percent of the agricultural land in the Netherlands is used for dairy farming [1]. The number of dairy farms is approximately 17,000 in the Netherlands [1,2]), and the number of cows used for Dutch dairy farming has decreased over the years, currently amounting at 1,590,000 (CBS, 2020 [3]).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Appreciating Multiple Realities in the Transformation towards a Sustainable Dairy Sector: An Explorative Study from the Inside-Out Perspective

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The dairy sector is in a systemic lock-in due to reinforcing cycles. This qualitative study, based on 13 in-depth interviews with frontrunning dairy farmers and additional observations, challenges this impression by looking at the sustainable business model innovation from the inside-out perspective of the sustainability-driven niche. The theoretical foundation rests in market transformation, looking at the co-evolution of sustainable business models, regime, system barriers and niche players. The objective is to gain a better understanding on the practices of frontrunner dairy farmers that innovate and overcome system barriers in the transformation from the current regime. The data is collected in 2020 and the analysis is based on template analysis. This study clustered the practices in five groups: an extra margin on milk, perceived support for product diversification, partnerships with specialists, increased transparency, and use of modern technology. Additionally, the appreciation by the farmers of multiple realities and their entrepreneurial competencies helped the dairy farmers to re-establish a closer connection between farmer and consumer, and a better connection between farmer and the production environment, resulting in more biodiverse and landscape-inclusive dairy farming. These insights will help policy makers better cater to the beliefs and values of dairy farmers.

show abstract

Feiten en cijfers over de Nederlandse veehouderijsectoren 2018

Cited by 14 publications

References 0 publications

Antimicrobial use and farmers' attitude toward mastitis treatment on dairy farms with automatic or conventional milking systems

Antimicrobial use and farmers' attitude toward mastitis treatment on dairy farms with automatic or conventional milking systems

A Food System Approach for Sustainable Food-Based Dietary Guidelines: An Exploratory Scenario Study on Dutch Animal Food Products

Appreciating Multiple Realities in the Transformation towards a Sustainable Dairy Sector: An Explorative Study from the Inside-Out Perspective

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About