2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2023.106845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FeIII-substituted brucite: Hydrothermal synthesis from (Mg0.8FeII0.2)-brucite, crystal chemistry and relevance to the alteration of ultramafic rocks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(84 reference statements)
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An empirical relationship to estimate the Fe­(II) mol % in brucite was derived from the relationship between the 001 peak position and Fe­(II) content (Figure c). The relationship between refined 001 peak positions and Fe­(II)-content in brucite from our study is consistent with results for natural and synthetic 20 mol % Fe­(II)-brucite from Mumpton and Thompson (4.741 Å) and Carlin et al (4.751 Å), and for endmember Fe II (OH) 2 characterized by Bernal et al (4.597 Å) and Parise et al (4.601 Å). This relationship (Figure c) could be used to estimate the amount of Fe­(II) within brucite in both pure minerals and multiphase mixtures containing brucite, provided that Mg and Fe­(II) are the only cations present at high abundance in brucite.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An empirical relationship to estimate the Fe­(II) mol % in brucite was derived from the relationship between the 001 peak position and Fe­(II) content (Figure c). The relationship between refined 001 peak positions and Fe­(II)-content in brucite from our study is consistent with results for natural and synthetic 20 mol % Fe­(II)-brucite from Mumpton and Thompson (4.741 Å) and Carlin et al (4.751 Å), and for endmember Fe II (OH) 2 characterized by Bernal et al (4.597 Å) and Parise et al (4.601 Å). This relationship (Figure c) could be used to estimate the amount of Fe­(II) within brucite in both pure minerals and multiphase mixtures containing brucite, provided that Mg and Fe­(II) are the only cations present at high abundance in brucite.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This is significantly lower than the values obtained using our XRD-based method, described in Figure c. The differences could be due to incorporation of Fe­(III) into the natural brucite samples that contract the unit cell along the c axis since Fe 3+ has a smaller ionic radius compared to Fe 2+ and Mg. , Another possibility for Mount Keith brucite could be an underestimation of Fe­(II) in brucite during EPMA analysis due to brucite intergrowth with LDH (i.e., iowaite–pyroaurite) or serpentine-group minerals, which is commonly observed in serpentinites. It remains unclear why this relationship does not work for natural samples of Fe-bearing brucite; however, our results indicate that chemical analyses should be used in preference to the crystallographic measurement.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ferroan brucite (Mg 1−x ,Fe x )(OH) 2 , with x ranging from 0.156 to 0.205, was synthesised under ambient conditions from a stoichiometric solution of dissolved Fe(II) and Mg chlorides, as described in Carlin et al (2023). The ferroan brucite obtained by this method formed platelets 40 to 100 nm across (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ferroan brucite, Mg 1– X Fe X (OH) 2 , was preserved in serpentinized peridotites with x (the doping amount of Fe 2+ ) generally ranging from 0.05 to 0.35 per formula unit. Petrographic investigation had actually shown that the alteration of minerals bearing ferrous iron hosted under subsurface conditions could lead to further iron oxidation . Boschi et al found that the Mg 1– X Fe X (OH) 2 was an unstable mineral and would transform into stable mineral in a natural environment .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12−14 Petrographic investigation had actually shown that the alteration of minerals bearing ferrous iron hosted under subsurface conditions could lead to further iron oxidation. 12 Boschi et al found that the Mg 1−X Fe X (OH) 2 was an unstable mineral and would transform into stable mineral in a natural environment. 13 Mg 10 Fe 2 CO 3 (OH) 24 •2H 2 O in CO 2 -bearing groundwater.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%