2018
DOI: 10.1177/0093854818766562
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feigned Miranda Impairment by Legally Involved Juveniles: The Vulnerability of Forensic Measures and the Development of Effective Screens

Abstract: Forensic studies have almost entirely neglected research on adolescent offenders and their abilities to engage in malingering and other forms of deception. The present research represents the first empirical investigation into feigned Miranda-specific impairment by legally involved juveniles. Feigners (n = 62) were compared with archival data (n = 245) under genuine conditions. With virtually no preparation, juveniles effectively feigned major impairment on the Miranda Rights Comprehension Instruments (MRCI) a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, relatively few studies have focused on identifying feigned Miranda abilities. The authors of the SAMA (Rogers et al., 2012) and their colleagues (Rogers, Henry, et al., 2017, Rogers, Robinson, et al., 2017, 2018) utilized one amplified detection strategy (FE) and one unlikely detection strategy described as the performance‐curve (PC) strategy (i.e., more errors as the item difficulty increases). While no genuine responders violated the PC strategy, it proved ineffective because substantial numbers of genuine responders also scored poorly, even on the easy items (Rogers, Robinson, et al., 2017).…”
Section: Miranda Quizmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, relatively few studies have focused on identifying feigned Miranda abilities. The authors of the SAMA (Rogers et al., 2012) and their colleagues (Rogers, Henry, et al., 2017, Rogers, Robinson, et al., 2017, 2018) utilized one amplified detection strategy (FE) and one unlikely detection strategy described as the performance‐curve (PC) strategy (i.e., more errors as the item difficulty increases). While no genuine responders violated the PC strategy, it proved ineffective because substantial numbers of genuine responders also scored poorly, even on the easy items (Rogers, Robinson, et al., 2017).…”
Section: Miranda Quizmentioning
confidence: 99%