2023
DOI: 10.1080/02134748.2023.2236468
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feeling poor or feeling poorer: comparing subjective measures of income in predicting health and well-being ( Sentirse pobre o más pobre: comparación de medidas subjetivas del nivel de ingresos en la predicción de la salud y el bienestar )

Karen M. Gilbert,
David Weissman,
Jonathan Gordils
et al.

Abstract: Separate areas of research have found that need-based and relative-based operationalizations of subjective income are important for health. Need-and relative-based measures are conceptually distinct, but differential implications for downstream outcomes have never been directly tested. In the present study, US residents (N = 844) reported their subjective-need and subjective-relative income, as well as their health and well-being. Subjective-need and subjective-relative had distinct and sometimes opposing asso… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, we generated 3 × 3 items measuring the evaluative aspect of economic scarcity. Drawing on the achievement motivations literature on the standards of evaluation (Elliot & Murayama, 2008; Gilbert et al., 2023; Sommet et al., 2019), we generated three items for each of the standards one might use to evaluate their economic situation as scarce (i) by assessing the resources they have as inferior to the resources they need (an absolute reference point, e.g. ‘I do not have enough money to cover monthly expenses’), (ii) by comparing their economic situation to others (an other‐based reference point, e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, we generated 3 × 3 items measuring the evaluative aspect of economic scarcity. Drawing on the achievement motivations literature on the standards of evaluation (Elliot & Murayama, 2008; Gilbert et al., 2023; Sommet et al., 2019), we generated three items for each of the standards one might use to evaluate their economic situation as scarce (i) by assessing the resources they have as inferior to the resources they need (an absolute reference point, e.g. ‘I do not have enough money to cover monthly expenses’), (ii) by comparing their economic situation to others (an other‐based reference point, e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Goethals & Darley, 1977). We know from the literature on achievement motivation that individuals typically assess self‐attributes such as competence, economic position or even subjective income, using one of two standards of evaluation (for theoretical work, see Elliot, 1999; for work relevant to the economic domain, see Gilbert et al., 2023; Sommet et al., 2019). On the one hand, individuals can assess their resources as sufficient or insufficient based on a task‐based standard, which in our case means determining whether their resources are inferior (scarcity) or superior (abundance) to their needs (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gilbert et al (2023) make an innovative direct comparison between two subjective income-related measures of SES, and how they are associated with health and well-being outcomes. A need-based measure assesses how well people think their income allows them to buy basic goods, and a relative measure assesses subjective comparisons with others.…”
Section: The Articles In the Special Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gilbert et al (2023) realizan una novedosa comparación directa entre dos medidas del NSE relacionadas con los ingresos subjetivos y sus vínculos con la salud y el bienestar. Una medida basada en la necesidad evalúa en qué medida los participantes perciben que sus ingresos les permiten adquirir bienes básicos, mientras que una medida relativa establece comparaciones subjetivas con otras personas.…”
Section: Los Artículos De Este Monográficounclassified