2013
DOI: 10.1177/0022146513498510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Feeling Disorder” as a Comparative and Contingent Process

Abstract: We explore the effects of neighborhood social disorder on internalizing symptoms among urban youth, focusing on three questions: First, we ask whether the impact of social disorder on internalizing symptoms results from comparisons to conditions measured locally or across the entire city. Second, we consider whether neighborhood collective efficacy modifies disorder’s effect on internalizing symptoms. Finally, we assess whether these effects vary by gender. Analyses of survey data of 2,367 youth from the Proje… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Research based on social disorganization perspectives has produced inconsistent findings regarding the influence of neighborhood ethnic concentration (usually indicated by the percentage Latino in the neighborhood) on pan-racial/ethnic children’s development (see Leventhal & Brooks-Gunn, 2000 for a review), perhaps because neighborhoods do not have one-size-fits-all implications for youth development (Browning et al, 2013). Though social disorganization theory recognizes that neighborhood ethnic homogeneity should support the development of social networks capable of promoting positive youth development (usually operationalized in terms of behavioral and emotional health), it requires incorporation of culturally-informed perspectives on enclave communities to recognize that the percentage Latino in the neighborhood may have important and specific implications for co-ethnic youths’ development of cultural attitudes and identities (García Coll et al, 1996; Portes & Rumbaut, 2001; Rumbaut & Portes, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Research based on social disorganization perspectives has produced inconsistent findings regarding the influence of neighborhood ethnic concentration (usually indicated by the percentage Latino in the neighborhood) on pan-racial/ethnic children’s development (see Leventhal & Brooks-Gunn, 2000 for a review), perhaps because neighborhoods do not have one-size-fits-all implications for youth development (Browning et al, 2013). Though social disorganization theory recognizes that neighborhood ethnic homogeneity should support the development of social networks capable of promoting positive youth development (usually operationalized in terms of behavioral and emotional health), it requires incorporation of culturally-informed perspectives on enclave communities to recognize that the percentage Latino in the neighborhood may have important and specific implications for co-ethnic youths’ development of cultural attitudes and identities (García Coll et al, 1996; Portes & Rumbaut, 2001; Rumbaut & Portes, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Residence in ethnically concentrated neighborhoods during middle childhood and adolescence may support co-ethnic youths to (a) develop positive ethnic identities, (b) develop positive attitudes toward in-group members, and (d) perceive less discrimination (García Coll & Marks, 2009). Consequently, neighborhood Latino ethnic concentration, rather than having one-neighborhood-fits-all implications for youth development reflected in social disorganization theoretical perspectives (see Browning, Soller, Gardner, & Brooks-Gunn, 2013 for a recent discussion), may have specific and unique implications for co-ethnics (García Coll et al, 1996). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neighborhood disorder is likely a source of stress for residents, and broken windows theory suggests that it sends a message that no one is “in charge,” which increases fear among residents, weakens informal social control, contributes to emigration and disinvestment in the neighborhood, and invites further criminal behavior and incivilities (Sampson & Raudenbush, 2004; Sampson et al, 2002; Wilson & Kelling, 1982). Because high levels of neighborhood disorder are associated with physical and mental health problems, unhealthy behaviors, and risk behaviors (Browning et al, 2013; Cohen et al, 2000; Franzini et al, 2009; Lambert et al, 2004; Ross & Mirowsky, 1999; Sampson et al, 2002), investigating the mechanisms by which neighborhood disorder may impact behavior is an important field of inquiry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus people experiencing chronic stress prior to a disaster may be particularly vulnerable to adverse mental health afterwards. Within an individual’s environment, neighborhood factors such as economic disadvantage [6,7] and physical disorder [8,9] have been linked to increased depressive symptoms and decreased psychological well-being. In order to guide disaster preparedness and response, it is important to identify whether post-disaster depression varies by neighborhood conditions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%