2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cossms.2018.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feedstock powder processing research needs for additive manufacturing development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
56
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Adapted from Reference [9] with permission from Elsevier.While the market and the applications of laser powder bed fusion continuously and impressively grew in recent years, there is a common view across users and researchers concerning the repeatability of the process in terms of chemical composition and mechanical properties of the final parts, which are of paramount importance when challenging environmental or testing conditions are considered [10][11][12][13][14][15][16].The most typical approach to study the microstructural and mechanical properties of parts built by LPBF is to compare them with castings of the same alloy or, rather, the corresponding alloy since the starting material is metal powder rather than a fuse. However, in some existing alloys designed for cast and wrought parts, laser additive manufacturing processing results in cracking or other microstructure deficiencies [11,12,16,17]. It is worth noting that LPBF has more similarities with laser welding rather than casting, since the two laser-based techniques have some common features (i.e., melt-pool formation, moving heat source) [18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Adapted from Reference [9] with permission from Elsevier.While the market and the applications of laser powder bed fusion continuously and impressively grew in recent years, there is a common view across users and researchers concerning the repeatability of the process in terms of chemical composition and mechanical properties of the final parts, which are of paramount importance when challenging environmental or testing conditions are considered [10][11][12][13][14][15][16].The most typical approach to study the microstructural and mechanical properties of parts built by LPBF is to compare them with castings of the same alloy or, rather, the corresponding alloy since the starting material is metal powder rather than a fuse. However, in some existing alloys designed for cast and wrought parts, laser additive manufacturing processing results in cracking or other microstructure deficiencies [11,12,16,17]. It is worth noting that LPBF has more similarities with laser welding rather than casting, since the two laser-based techniques have some common features (i.e., melt-pool formation, moving heat source) [18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most typical approach to study the microstructural and mechanical properties of parts built by LPBF is to compare them with castings of the same alloy or, rather, the corresponding alloy since the starting material is metal powder rather than a fuse. However, in some existing alloys designed for cast and wrought parts, laser additive manufacturing processing results in cracking or other microstructure deficiencies [11,12,16,17]. It is worth noting that LPBF has more similarities with laser welding rather than casting, since the two laser-based techniques have some common features (i.e., melt-pool formation, moving heat source) [18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the processing conditions, different other powder morphologies can be obtained (like irregular, satellite, "splat cap", elongated, broken, agglomerated etc.) [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Smooth spherical powders are the most desired for AM processes because they ensure a better flowability compared to other morphologies, a higher flow rate is achieved by a reduced inter-particular friction and low risk of mechanical interlocking [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There exists a significant body of literature detailing various instabilities that occur during close-coupled gas atomization and how these may impact on the application of such powders as ALM feedstock (see e.g. the recent review by (Anderson et al, 2018)). The corollary of this is the prospect that if the stability of the atomization process could be improved, then a superior powder produce could be offered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%