1977
DOI: 10.2527/jas1977.4551131x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feedlot Performance and Carcass Traits of Progeny of Hereford, Hereford × Holstein and Holstein Cows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the Holstein steers consuming the LF diet had greater efficiency of gain than those receiving the HF diet. Previous research has reported that Holstein and Holstein crossbred steers range from having greater efficiency of gain (Thonney et al, 1981) to having lower efficiency of gain (Dean et al, 1976;Wyatt et al, 1977) compared to British steers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In contrast, the Holstein steers consuming the LF diet had greater efficiency of gain than those receiving the HF diet. Previous research has reported that Holstein and Holstein crossbred steers range from having greater efficiency of gain (Thonney et al, 1981) to having lower efficiency of gain (Dean et al, 1976;Wyatt et al, 1977) compared to British steers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Thus, at the same level of subcutaneous fatness, Holsteins will contain more carcass fat and more internal body fat than beefbreeds ofcattle. This result may also partly explain why dairy animals have often been shown to have poorer feed efficiency than beef animals (Wyatt et al 1977;Blakely et al 1979). Few trials have been conducted to examine the influence of dietary energy intake on fat partitioning and distribution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, larger dairy breed like Brown Swiss often showed heavier carcasses per day of age than Hereford and Angus (Berg, 1969;Urick et al, 1974;Koch et al, 1979). In a study involving Holsteins and their crosses, CWT and CWT per day of age increased with increasing levels of Holstein breeding (Lusby et al, 1975;Wyatt et al, 1977). At an age constant basis, Holsteins have also exhibited a higher CWT than Angus (Wellington, 1971) and Hereford-Angus crosses (Young et al, 1978).…”
Section: Breed Direct Additive Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When data were adjusted for weight differences, g'^ remained higher and significant (P<.05), and despite lack of significant difference between breeds, re-ranking was noticed between g\ and g'^,. Although some reports indicate a larger LMA in Holstein than Hereford (Dean et al, 1976), other results seem inconsistent, as values ranged from a better performance of Hereford and Angus than Holsteins (Cole et al, 1963;Martin and Wilson, 1974) to lack of significant differences (Lusby et al, 1975;Wyatt et al, 1977).…”
Section: Longissimus Muscle Areamentioning
confidence: 99%