1986
DOI: 10.1016/0377-8401(86)90018-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feeding value of sprouted wheat (Triticum aestivum) for beef cattle finishing diets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is consistent with earlier findings that higher levels of intake of a particular roughage were associated with reduced digestibility (Dong et al, , 2003bLong et al, 2004) or that high feeding levels led to low digestibility by ruminants because of the more rapid passage of digesta from the rumen (Ørskov and Ryle, 1990;Ørskov, 1992;Han et al, 1992;Hao et al, 2000;Long et al, 2004) in yaks. These yak findings also reflect results in cattle and water buffalo (Levy et al, 1986;Jewell and Campling, 1986;Rule et al, 1986;Huhtanen, 1988;Elizalde et al, 1996;Hussain and Cheeke, 1996;Mulligan et al, 2002;Shane Gadberry et al, 2005), and indicate a reduction in the time available for rumen fermentation and intestinal digestion (Han et al, 1997b;Liu et al, 1997;Xue and Han, 1997). As the experiment progressed, however, new rumen microorganisms adapted gradually to high-CP and -ME diets; thus, apparent digestibility continually increased during the study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…This finding is consistent with earlier findings that higher levels of intake of a particular roughage were associated with reduced digestibility (Dong et al, , 2003bLong et al, 2004) or that high feeding levels led to low digestibility by ruminants because of the more rapid passage of digesta from the rumen (Ørskov and Ryle, 1990;Ørskov, 1992;Han et al, 1992;Hao et al, 2000;Long et al, 2004) in yaks. These yak findings also reflect results in cattle and water buffalo (Levy et al, 1986;Jewell and Campling, 1986;Rule et al, 1986;Huhtanen, 1988;Elizalde et al, 1996;Hussain and Cheeke, 1996;Mulligan et al, 2002;Shane Gadberry et al, 2005), and indicate a reduction in the time available for rumen fermentation and intestinal digestion (Han et al, 1997b;Liu et al, 1997;Xue and Han, 1997). As the experiment progressed, however, new rumen microorganisms adapted gradually to high-CP and -ME diets; thus, apparent digestibility continually increased during the study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Rule et al (1986) reported no differences in dressing fraction, yield grade, or quality grade in cattle fed different blends of barley and wheat in high-grain diets. Similarly, there is no differences in hot carcass weight, back fat, yield grade in finishing steers fed barley compared with wheat (Galloway et al, 1993).…”
Section: Substituting Wheat For Barleymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, it has been reported that animal performance is similar when consuming sprout-damaged grain versus non-sprouted wheat grain. Rule et al [45] reported no differences in growth performance or carcass characteristics when comparing sprouted wheat with non-sprouted wheat in finishing rations containing 77% wheat-based concentrate. Reed et al [46] concluded that sprouted wheat is palatable, digestible sources of nutrients that can be used in beef cattle diets.…”
Section: Sprouted Frosted and Drought-damaged Wheatmentioning
confidence: 99%