2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2006.12.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feeding Practices of Severely Ill Intensive Care Unit Patients: An Evaluation of Energy Sources and Clinical Outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Mandel and Worthley [8] first reported the inadequacy of enteral nutritional intake in patients on general wards and intensive care units (ICUs) more than 25 years ago. Nonetheless, underfeeding continues to be a frequent problem in enterally fed critically ill patients [9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mandel and Worthley [8] first reported the inadequacy of enteral nutritional intake in patients on general wards and intensive care units (ICUs) more than 25 years ago. Nonetheless, underfeeding continues to be a frequent problem in enterally fed critically ill patients [9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Figure 2 should give the protein 1.5 -2 g/kg/day and account for 24-32 percent of the total received energy (8). Although the surgical ICU patients significantly received lipid-based sedation (or propofol) compared to the medical ward (18), it was the relatively small amount, and we did not include in the total energy calculation. On the total calories intake (Figure 3), the average of caloric intake in this study was 20 kcal/kg/day when the energy balance was nearly zero.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hise et al 94 made note that prior studies of nutritional intake neglect to quantify incidental kcal received through intravenous dextrose and lipid-based sedatives (eg, propofol). This group performed a prospective cohort study of 77 critically ill patients (in ICU Ն 5 d), accounting for calories received outside of nutritional therapy.…”
Section: Evidence Base For Nutrition Support In CCImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…91,94 However, a possible bias in these studies is that more severely ill patients are less likely to tolerate or receive uninterrupted EN and more likely to require a longer ICU course with more complications. 91 In sum, the above data are not convincing with respect to optimal nutrition support in the CCI patient.…”
Section: Evidence Base For Nutrition Support In CCImentioning
confidence: 99%