2013
DOI: 10.1007/s13364-012-0126-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feeding habits of invasive American mink (Neovison vison) in northern Germany—potential implications for fishery and waterfowl

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
7
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
7
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to previous studies which have found pronounced intraspecific differences in diet composition between individuals, sexes, seasons, and even years , Macdonnald & Harrington 2003, Skierczyński & Wiśniewska 2010, Magnusdottir et al 2012, the diversity of taxa that we identified in the diet of minks differed across seasons. First, we found a decline of mammals in the summer diet of minks, in accordance with the findings of Bartoszewicz & Zalewski (2003), whom also described a high proportion of mammals in the mink diet, highest in autumn and winter and declining in spring when minks preyed mostly on birds and accessible fish (but see Brzeziński 2008 andZschille et al 2013). In addition, the decrease of mammals in the diet coincided with an increase in birds in the summer months, evidence of a clear shift to the most available prey in each season (Bartoszewicz 2003).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar to previous studies which have found pronounced intraspecific differences in diet composition between individuals, sexes, seasons, and even years , Macdonnald & Harrington 2003, Skierczyński & Wiśniewska 2010, Magnusdottir et al 2012, the diversity of taxa that we identified in the diet of minks differed across seasons. First, we found a decline of mammals in the summer diet of minks, in accordance with the findings of Bartoszewicz & Zalewski (2003), whom also described a high proportion of mammals in the mink diet, highest in autumn and winter and declining in spring when minks preyed mostly on birds and accessible fish (but see Brzeziński 2008 andZschille et al 2013). In addition, the decrease of mammals in the diet coincided with an increase in birds in the summer months, evidence of a clear shift to the most available prey in each season (Bartoszewicz 2003).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The results obtained in an agricultural landscape differ from the results obtained in studies conducted in different habitats. For example, studies conducted at lakes showed that the largest part of the mink diet consisted of aquatic species (fish and amphibians, Brzeziński 2008), and in fish ponds minks preyed mainly on fish and birds (Zschille et al 2013). The shift from aquatic to terrestrial prey in mink diet in our study area is most likely caused by high rodent abundance in farmland areas (Briner et al 2005, Heroldová et al 2007, in possible combination with interspecific competition with otters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…we have identified. Mustelid species that we have investigated [ 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ], with the exception of the American mink [ 38 ], use carrion of wild ungulates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We chose this time frame to incorporate possible effects of environmental conditions and trophic mismatches (Drever et al 2012) on duckling survival from year t À 1 to year t when populations are counted. We also considered lag-1 effects for climate variables on the breeding grounds because climate during June t À 2 to May t À 1 can affect primary productivity and the abundance of alternate prey, e.g., microtine rodents for foxes (Elmhagen et al 2000) and fish for mink (Zschille et al 2014), potentially eliciting a numerical response in predators that could in turn affect waterfowl nest success and offspring survival in the following year (Walker et al 2013). To help with convergence, we standardized climatic variables over all strata to a mean of 0 and variance of 1 from the period 1958-2010, except snow cover extent, which was standardized to a mean of 0 and variance of 1 from the period 1968-2010 due to a lack of data prior to 1968.…”
Section: Climate Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%