2014
DOI: 10.1111/jzo.12196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feeding habits of extant and fossil canids as determined by their skull geometry

Abstract: The canids belong to one of the most prominent families of mammalian carnivores. Feeding adaptations of extant species is well documented by field observations; however, we are still missing palaeoecological insights for many enigmatic fossil specimens. We employ geometric morphometrics to quantify skull size and shape in extant and fossil members of the Canini tribe, inclusive of jackals and wolf-like taxa. Skull data are tested to identify correlates of dietary adaptations in extant species for predicting ad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results suggest that much of the cranial shape change is related to accommodating temporalis. These findings may help inform work on interpreting the feeding habits of extinct species (e.g., Wroe et al, ; Meloro et al, ). It should be noted, however, that our findings do not preclude the cranial shape changes also being biomechanically advantageous to the different trophic groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Our results suggest that much of the cranial shape change is related to accommodating temporalis. These findings may help inform work on interpreting the feeding habits of extinct species (e.g., Wroe et al, ; Meloro et al, ). It should be noted, however, that our findings do not preclude the cranial shape changes also being biomechanically advantageous to the different trophic groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…, ; Meloro et al. ; Kienle and Berta ) or between‐group convergence (Gaubert et al. ; Figueirido et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unidentified individuals were included and categorised as unknown. Procrustes coordinates and LnCS were also used as independent variables but were less accurate and so were discarded (see also Meloro 2011 andMeloro et al 2015).…”
Section: Group Classification and Differentiationmentioning
confidence: 99%