1995
DOI: 10.3354/meps125149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feeding, growth and respiration in the polychaetes Nereis diversicolor (facultative filter-feeder) and N. virens (omnivorous)-a comparative study

Abstract: The polychaetes Nereis divers~color and N. virens were fed various amounts of shrimp meat in laboratory experiments and h e a r relationships between specific growth rate and specific respiration rates were found. From this relation the energy cost of growth ('specif~c dynamic action', SDA) was found to be 20 to 26% of the growth. The starvation respiration rate (maintenance) (R,,, p1 O2 h-' ind.-') as a function of body mass (W, g dry wt) was: R, = 1306 W' and R, = 704 W' O for N. diversicolor and N. virens, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
63
2

Year Published

1995
1995
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
6
63
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, SDA constituted a very substantial proportion of the total energy released by respiration in growing sponges. The present value of SDA in H. panicea may be compared to those reported for other marine invertebrates: 20 to 26% of the growth in Nereis diversicolor and N. virens (Nielsen et al 1995), 20% in the blue mussel Mytilus edulis (Jergensen 1990), 19% in the copepod Acartia tonsa (Ki~rboe et al 1985) and 40% in the sea star Asferias rubens (Vahl 1984). Thus, it seems obvious that sponges may differ from other invertebrates by having exceptionally high energy demands for growth.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Thus, SDA constituted a very substantial proportion of the total energy released by respiration in growing sponges. The present value of SDA in H. panicea may be compared to those reported for other marine invertebrates: 20 to 26% of the growth in Nereis diversicolor and N. virens (Nielsen et al 1995), 20% in the blue mussel Mytilus edulis (Jergensen 1990), 19% in the copepod Acartia tonsa (Ki~rboe et al 1985) and 40% in the sea star Asferias rubens (Vahl 1984). Thus, it seems obvious that sponges may differ from other invertebrates by having exceptionally high energy demands for growth.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…In the experimental aquaria, Hediste worms fed on commercial fish food (Sato & Nakashima 2003, present study), macro-algae (Sato 2006), and the deposits collected from the sediment surface of tidal flats and their isolated components (bacteria and protozoa, diatoms, cyanobacteria, Hediste faeces; see Tsuchiya & Kurihara 1979). Therefore, the filter feeding of the three Asian Hediste species is not obligatory but facultative, as for H. diversicolor (Nielsen et al 1995) and is probably a generic feature of Hediste unique among nereidid polychaetes, although it has yet to be confirmed in the American species, H. limnicola.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The latter habit involves consuming a mucous filter which it secretes to trap fine particles brought into the burrow by water circulation. This species shifts from predatory/surface deposit feeding to filter-feeding when the phytoplankton concentration is sufficiently high (Harley 1950, Rönn et al 1988, Riisgård 1991, 1994, Riisgård & Larsen 1995, Nielsen et al 1995, Scaps 2002. There is no record of filter-feeding in any other nereidid species, although obligatory filter-feeding is common in other polychaete families such as the Chaetopteridae, where the filter and pump system is quite similar to that of H. diversicolor (Riisgård 1989, Riisgård & Larsen 1995.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This same study was used to classify species according to the feeding habit of their families, but other studies were used to revise them (JONES, 1968;NOYES, 1980;WORD, 1980;PLEIJEL, 1983;DOBBS;SCHOLLY, 1986;FONG, 1987;GASTON, 1987;CARRASCO;OYARZÚN, 1988;NIELSEN et al, 1995;FERNER;JUMARS, 1999;GIANGRANDE et al, 2000;BRITAEV;LYSKIN, 2002;LEE et al, 2004;COSTA et al, 2006;AMARAL, 2006;DUBOIS et al, 2009;SMART;DASSOW, 2009;PLYUSCHEVA et al, 2010). Generalized linear models with distance, sediment (Sed) and/or transect (Tr) as predictor variables were also fitted to evaluate the functional community (trophic groups).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%