1979
DOI: 10.1007/bf00005525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feeding by Arizona trout (Salmo apache) and brown trout (Salmo trutta) at different light intensities

Abstract: SynopsisBrown trout (Salmo trutta) were more efficient than Arizona trout (Salmo apache) in eating brine shrimp at starlight fL) light levels. Arizona trout required light levels 2 moonlight (10-VL) to feed. In bright light (50 fL), brown trout utilized cover to a much greater extent in both field and laboratory. Our study indicates that factors other than competition for food or habitat are probably causing the displacement of Arizona trout by brown trout when browns are stocked into the native habitat of Ari… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Most stream salmonids are visual foragers, preying primarily upon drifting invertebrates while maintaining focal points in the water column (Angradi and Grith 1990;see Kitano et al 1993 for rainbow trout in the Horonai Stream). In such drift foragers, the foraging eciency generally decreases with lower light intensity (Robinson and Tash 1979). Thus, the above``risk-of-predation hypothesis'' can at least partly explain the nocturnal periodicity of may¯y drift in the Horonai Stream.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Most stream salmonids are visual foragers, preying primarily upon drifting invertebrates while maintaining focal points in the water column (Angradi and Grith 1990;see Kitano et al 1993 for rainbow trout in the Horonai Stream). In such drift foragers, the foraging eciency generally decreases with lower light intensity (Robinson and Tash 1979). Thus, the above``risk-of-predation hypothesis'' can at least partly explain the nocturnal periodicity of may¯y drift in the Horonai Stream.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Salmonids detect prey visually and so are unable to feed at light levels below which they cannot see (Robinson & Tash 1979, Tanaka 1970) . One reason for variation in the rate of feeding at night may, therefore, be the amount of light available, as determined by the moon phase and weather .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One important aspect of the feeding behaviour of salmonids which has received limited attention is changes in feeding and prey selection over the diel cycle . Feeding might be expected to differ between day and night because salmonids feed visually (Robinson & Tash 1979, Tanaka 1970, and so should feed less efficiently, and perhaps also less selectively, after dark . In addition, there are marked diel changes in the availability of their prey.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…L'aptitude à capturer des proies la nuit est connue chez la truite (ROBINSON et TASH, 1979). Un partage temporel des postes d'alimentation serait également possible entre les congénères, certains individus accédant à un poste d'alimentation favorable la nuit uniquement (ROUSSEL, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified