2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2016.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feedbacks among O2 and CO2 in deep soil gas, oxidation of ferrous minerals, and fractures: A hypothesis for steady-state regolith thickness

Abstract: O 2 and CO 2 , the two essential reactants in weathering along with water and minerals, are important in deep regolith development because they diffuse to weathering fronts at depth. We monitored the dynamics of these gas concentrations in the hand-augerable zone on three ridgetops-one on granite and two on diabase-in Virginia (VA) and Pennsylvania (PA), U.S.A. and related the gas chemistry to regolith development. The VA granite and the PA diabase protoliths were more deeply weathered than the VA diabase. We … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(87 reference statements)
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Angert et al (2015) observed that forest soils in humid, temperate systems (with low pH) rarely attained the ARQ ∼1 anticipated by diffusion and aerobic respiration; they posited that the soils in these acidic forests often have significant levels of reduced Fe in the O and A horizons. Kim et al (2017) observed a similar signature of Fe redox in the subsurface of a diabase‐derived soil in the piedmont of Virginia. This oxidation of Fe in both the soil surface and subsurface likely also contributes to the ARQ <1 we observe in the soils of the SSHCZO because high levels of redox‐active metals have been documented in the surface and subsurface soils of Shale Hills (Herndon et al, 2011; Jin et al, 2010; Kraepiel et al, 2015; Yesavage et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For example, Angert et al (2015) observed that forest soils in humid, temperate systems (with low pH) rarely attained the ARQ ∼1 anticipated by diffusion and aerobic respiration; they posited that the soils in these acidic forests often have significant levels of reduced Fe in the O and A horizons. Kim et al (2017) observed a similar signature of Fe redox in the subsurface of a diabase‐derived soil in the piedmont of Virginia. This oxidation of Fe in both the soil surface and subsurface likely also contributes to the ARQ <1 we observe in the soils of the SSHCZO because high levels of redox‐active metals have been documented in the surface and subsurface soils of Shale Hills (Herndon et al, 2011; Jin et al, 2010; Kraepiel et al, 2015; Yesavage et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The capacities of minerals in the parent rock to consume O 2 through oxidation and to consume CO 2 through dissolution have been used to clarify the role of soil gases in weathering induced fracturing and regolith development (Brantley et al, 2014). Recently, scientists interested in understanding biotic controls on soil gases have also started using simultaneous measurements of soil CO 2 and O 2 to calculate the apparent respiratory quotient (Angert et al, 2015; Kim et al, 2017; Sánchez‐Cañete et al, 2018; Stinchcomb et al, 2018). The apparent respiratory quotient (ARQ) is the ratio of change of soil CO 2 from atmospheric conditions divided by the change of soil O 2 from atmospheric concentrations, corrected for the difference in diffusion rates between the two gases.…”
Section: Reactions In Soil With Ratio That Could Results In a Change mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To estimate the oxidation ratio a best fit linear equation for all pO 2 versus pCO 2 was determined (adapted from Kim et al, , equation ): pO2=()a*x()pCO2+b where a* represents the oxidation ratio that has been corrected for the relative diffusivity difference between O 2 and CO 2 ; that is, the product of a (the slope of pO 2 versus pCO 2 ) and D O2 / D CO2 (adapted from Angert et al, and Kim et al, , equation ). a*=0.1820.138a=1.32a …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%