1992
DOI: 10.2307/2234525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feedback Traders and Stock Return Autocorrelations: Evidence from a Century of Daily Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

30
390
4
6

Year Published

1998
1998
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 320 publications
(439 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
30
390
4
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, the observed negative auto-correlation is completely explained by the bid-ask bounce effect, and we can rule out alternative explanations, like positive feedback trading (Sentana and Wadhwani, 1992). This result supports the efficiency of the Italian futures market.…”
Section: Preliminary Analysissupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Then, the observed negative auto-correlation is completely explained by the bid-ask bounce effect, and we can rule out alternative explanations, like positive feedback trading (Sentana and Wadhwani, 1992). This result supports the efficiency of the Italian futures market.…”
Section: Preliminary Analysissupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Our empirical design is based on the framework proposed by Sentana and Wadhwani (1992), according to which there exist two types of traders, rational speculators and feedback traders. Rational speculators aim at maximizing their expected mean-variance utility in the following demand function:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An issue arises, however, with the extent to which the autocorrelation observed is due to feedback traders or extant market frictions, caused by for example non-synchronous and thin trading. To that end, Sentana and Wadhwani (1992) proposed the following specification of equation (5):…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because of the non-trading, the trading volume, which is strongly positive related with volatility, lowers. Thus, we have a market with low trade Kim [180], Sentana and Wadhwani [278] and Oedegaard [253] have also investigated the relationship between autocorrelation and volatility and found an inverse relation between volatility and autocorrelation. Moreover, Oedegaard [253] found that the evidence of autocorrelation, for the S&P500 daily index, decreased over time, possibly because of the introduction of financial derivatives (options and futures) on the index.…”
Section: Volatility and Serial Correlationmentioning
confidence: 99%