2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11538-016-0161-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feedback Regulation in a Cancer Stem Cell Model can Cause an Allee Effect

Abstract: The exact mechanisms of spontaneous tumor remission or complete response to treatment are phenomena in oncology that are not completely understood. We use a concept from ecology, the Allee effect, to help explain tumor extinction in a model of tumor growth that incorporates feedback regulation of stem cell dynamics, which occurs in many tumor types where certain signaling molecules, such as Wnts, are upregulated. Due to feedback and the Allee effect, a tumor may become extinct spontaneously or after therapy ev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No studies have been conducted that systematically characterize the negative feedback loops still present in specific cancers, although it has been suggested that negative feedback has to be invoked to explain certain experimentally observed tumor growth patterns (18). The results reported here further emphasize the need to investigate which aspects of healthy tissue cell hierarchies remain active in tumors (23), and how this relates to treatment outcome. Not all feedback mechanisms, however, enable permanent shifts in tumor stem cell fractions after therapy, and further mathematical work should take a more comprehensive approach (34) to define possible feedback patterns that can and cannot induce this effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…No studies have been conducted that systematically characterize the negative feedback loops still present in specific cancers, although it has been suggested that negative feedback has to be invoked to explain certain experimentally observed tumor growth patterns (18). The results reported here further emphasize the need to investigate which aspects of healthy tissue cell hierarchies remain active in tumors (23), and how this relates to treatment outcome. Not all feedback mechanisms, however, enable permanent shifts in tumor stem cell fractions after therapy, and further mathematical work should take a more comprehensive approach (34) to define possible feedback patterns that can and cannot induce this effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…More precisely, r1=r1false(0false)1+hDk,r2=r2false(0false)1+hDk, where r 1 (0) and r 2 (0) are the division rates without negative feedback and the parameters k and h control the strength of the inhibitory signals (for a schematic representation see Figure 2A). The modeling of the division rates using Hill equations builds on previous work on feedback regulation by others and us (13,1923). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7C, solid line). However, if the treatment stops at T=200 when the GSCs have been decreased to a sufficiently low level so as to induce an Allee effect (37), the tumor does not regrow. Therefore, the results suggest that a combination of anti-angiogenic, anti-mitotic, differentiation and anti-GEC therapy greatly reduces tumor growth and invasion, and could eradicate the tumor without recurrence when the treatment is stopped – achieving long-lasting remission.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper contributes to the growing literature on the theory of stem cells, which ranges from ODE modeling (Stiehl and Marciniak-Czochra, 2011; Nakata et al, 2012) to stochastic modeling (Enderling et al, 2007, 2009a,b,c; Dingli et al, 2007), and includes research of stem cells in the context of feedback mechanisms (Lander et al, 2009; Youssefpour et al, 2012; Konstorum et al, 2016; Kunche et al, 2016), carcinogenesis (Yatabe et al, 2001; Hardy and Stark, 2002; Ganguly and Puri, 2006; Johnston et al, 2007; Ganguly and Puri, 2007; Boman et al, 2008; Ashkenazi et al, 2007, 2008; Enderling and Hahnfeldt, 2011), modeling hematopoietic SC dynamics (Glauche et al, 2007; Marciniak-Czochra et al, 2009; Foo et al, 2009; Stiehl and Marciniak-Czochra, 2012), and cancer stem cells (Dingli and Michor, 2006; Johnston et al, 2010; Enderling and Hahnfeldt, 2011; Hillen et al, 2013; Scott et al, 2014; Enderling, 2015). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%