2015
DOI: 10.14221/ajte.2015v40n1.10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feedback, Iterative Processing and Academic Trust - Teacher Education Students' Perceptions of Assessment Feedback

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Without meaningful and constructive feedback, whether oral and face-to-face or written, novices cannot judge whether their practices are up to professional standards and achieved the learning outcome (Ali & Al-Adawi, 2013;Ronfeldt & Grossman, 2008). Constructive feedback can motivate PSTs and encourage them to exert more effort on improving their teaching performance (Ali & Al-Adawi, 2013;Copland, 2010Copland, , 2011Davis & Dargusch, 2015;Hattie & Timperley, 2007;White, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without meaningful and constructive feedback, whether oral and face-to-face or written, novices cannot judge whether their practices are up to professional standards and achieved the learning outcome (Ali & Al-Adawi, 2013;Ronfeldt & Grossman, 2008). Constructive feedback can motivate PSTs and encourage them to exert more effort on improving their teaching performance (Ali & Al-Adawi, 2013;Copland, 2010Copland, , 2011Davis & Dargusch, 2015;Hattie & Timperley, 2007;White, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with theory on the value of iteration in learning processes for PSTs (e.g., Davis & Dargusch, 2015;, this sequence was repeated as iterations of the ELR process. Each Module was treated as a discussion-based learning intervention for the PSTs and each intervention was preceded by a training session that explained the process to be undertaken and the rationale behind each Module.…”
Section: Enhancement Lesson Reflection Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The project focuses, in particular, on the projects that have developed sustainable and scalable models through iterative trials of learning procedures (e.g., . The project process is iterated to allow opportunities for using both collaboration and feedback/reflection to impact on lesson teaching (e.g., Davis & Dargusch, 2015). Iteration in early project trials served also as a manageable way of testing processes through repetition across small volunteer groups prior to up-scaling and embedding of similar processes in courses and workshops for larger groups.…”
Section: The Collaboration Nexusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extensive literature on topics such as student engagement, alienation theory [1,2,[5][6][7][8][9] and trust [10][11][12][13][14] in HE exist, albeit in isolation. There is an absence of investigation that links the concepts together for the WP HE demographic, notoriously disadvantaged from the outset of University life [4,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%