2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2319-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feedback generates a second receptive field in neurons of the visual cortex

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

24
220
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(286 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
24
220
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The main effect of silencing activity in HVAs was a decrease in activity during the late phase of the V1response, which was more pronounced for figures than the background, thereby decreasing FGM ( Figure S6). Importantly, these excitatory feedback effects imply that FGM is not caused by surround suppression and are consistent with predominantly excitatory (or disinhibitory) feedback effects on V1 activity (Huh et al, 2018;Hup茅 et al, 1998;Keller et al, 2020). However, a study in monkeys (Nassi et al, 2013) demonstrated that the cooling of HVAs increased V1 activity evoked by large stimuli, which suggested a suppressive influence of feedback connections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The main effect of silencing activity in HVAs was a decrease in activity during the late phase of the V1response, which was more pronounced for figures than the background, thereby decreasing FGM ( Figure S6). Importantly, these excitatory feedback effects imply that FGM is not caused by surround suppression and are consistent with predominantly excitatory (or disinhibitory) feedback effects on V1 activity (Huh et al, 2018;Hup茅 et al, 1998;Keller et al, 2020). However, a study in monkeys (Nassi et al, 2013) demonstrated that the cooling of HVAs increased V1 activity evoked by large stimuli, which suggested a suppressive influence of feedback connections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…the non-negative least squares (NNLS) 16,40 solution to each surrogate data set, and select from these, several data-compatible model parameters for which the network steady-states provide the best fit. This optimization takes as sole input the response data and uses no prior information on the synaptic structure, hence it is not obvious that any meaningful synaptic structure should be recoverable from such a procedure.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inhibitory sub-circuit is composed of multiple elements with three types -parvalbumin-(PV), somatostatin-(SOM), and vasoactive-intestinal-peptide (VIP) expressing cells that constitute 80% of GABAergic interneurons in the mouse primary visual cortex (V1) 8 . These inhibitory cell types do not act in unison, but differentially contribute to response tuning [9][10][11][12] and to contextual [13][14][15][16][17] and behavioral-state modulations [18][19][20][21] . In particular, two of these types, SOM and VIP, engage in competitive dynamics whose outcome directly regulates pyramidal cell activity via inhibition or disinhibition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the apical dendritic tufts of cortical pyramidal neurons in layer 1 receive top-down feedback inputs from higher-order cortical areas (Rockland and Pandya, 1979;Felleman and Van Essen, 1991;Cauller et al, 1998) and inputs from thalamocortical projections (Roth et al, 2016). These long-range excitatory inputs are thought to provide contextual information to primary cortex neurons, regulating the integration and gain of sensory-evoked responses (Schiller et al, 1997;Larkum and Zhu, 2002;Larkum et al, 2004;Wang et al, 2007;Nassi et al, 2013;Keller et al, 2020). In addition, pyramidal neurons also receive inhibitory inputs on both apical dendritic shafts and spines (refs) that are robustly modulated by arousal and locomotion (Fu et al, 2014a;Pakan et al, 2016;Dipoppa et al, 2018) and can modulate excitatory synaptic inputs to spines (Chiu et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%