2018
DOI: 10.1109/tit.2018.2809554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feedback Capacity and Coding for the BIBO Channel With a No-Repeated-Ones Input Constraint

Abstract: In this paper, a general binary-input binary-output (BIBO) channel is investigated in the presence of feedback and input constraints. The feedback capacity and the optimal input distribution of this setting are calculated for the case of an (1, ∞)-RLL input constraint, that is, the input sequence contains no consecutive ones. These results are obtained via explicit solution of an equivalent dynamic programming optimization problem. A simple coding scheme is designed based on the principle of posterior matching… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A useful approach for computing the feedback capacity is via dynamic programming (DP) methods [11]- [13]. When the DP problem can be solved analytically, simple capacity expressions and optimal coding schemes can be determined [14]- [21]. However, in most cases analytical solutions are infeasible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A useful approach for computing the feedback capacity is via dynamic programming (DP) methods [11]- [13]. When the DP problem can be solved analytically, simple capacity expressions and optimal coding schemes can be determined [14]- [21]. However, in most cases analytical solutions are infeasible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will present a posterior matching (PM) scheme that achieves the lower bound for any graph-based encoder. The scheme is inspired by the PM principle for memoryless channels [23] that was extended to systems with memory [21]. Thus, any graph-based encoder implies a simple coding scheme that achieves I(X, S; Y |Q) even if the lower bound does not attain the capacity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where the feedback capacity is explicitly determined include the ANC [17], the finite-state channel with states known at both transmitter and receiver [31], the trapdoor channel [32], the Ising channel [33], the symmetric finite-state Markov channel [34], and the BEC [10] and the binary-input binary-output channel [35] with both channels subjected to a no consecutive ones input constraint.…”
Section: Single-letter Expressions or Exact Values Of Such Capacitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where (35) holds since X 1 = V 1 , (36) follows from (6), (37) follows form (1) and the fact that the noise process is independent of the message, (38) holds since X 2 = f * (V 2 , Z 1 ) and (39) is obtained by repeating the steps (35)- (38). To analyze the first term in (34), we consider Pr(Y i = y i |Y i−1 = y i−1 ) for two cases:…”
Section: Nec Capacity-cost Function With Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To facilitate this analysis, the convex analytic method [32] was used, e.g., in [8] and [33], while in [26], [34], [35], [36], [27], [37], and [38] the average cost optimality equation was used (typically through the vanishing discount method). In particular, [34], [37], and [38] use this latter approach to solve dynamic programs that provide explicit channel capacity expressions. In this paper (unlike in our earlier work [8]), we also use the average cost optimality equation approach, but here certain technical subtleties complicate…”
Section: B Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%