Abstract:With evidence of pollinator declines and an increasing focus on restoration, interest is growing in investigating floral resources for native bees. Although native bees forage on shrubs, few studies have explored the pollinator communities of native shrubs and none have examined shrub-pollinator interactions in riparian areas of the northwestern United States. Life history traits of shrubs may make them particularly important resources for bees, especially in early spring-a key point in the lifecycle of many b… Show more
“…It has been previously suggested that planting willows near fruit and berry crops is an effective way to increase fruit production via increased pollination [14,51]. Both native and introduced willows may be strategically planted near agricultural fields along with pollinator-dependent crops to provide essential nutrient resources for bees prior to the mass flowering of agricultural crops.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, willows support a high density of breeding bird communities by providing services such as nesting, food, and stopover sites [13]. Willows are considered an ecosystem "foundation species", due to the high number of insects they bolster [14]. Furthermore, willow short rotation coppice (SRC) plantations reduce the negative consequences of habitat fragmentation with the provision of food and shelter for a high proportion of animals that move from adjacent habitats into the plantations [15].…”
Introduced willows have mostly been employed as a renewable feedstock for bioenergy in the northeastern USA. The question of whether introduced willows provide the same biodiversity value and attractiveness as native willows has not yet been explored. The objective of this study was to compare the attractiveness of native and introduced willows to different subfamilies of bees. The common garden experiment planted at Storrs, CT, USA, included three native (S. eriocephala, S. sericea, S. lucida) and three introduced (S. ‘SX64’, S. ‘Onondaga’, S. ‘S365’) willows. Various willow taxa flowered at different times through spring, allowing pollinators to be collected over a 6-week period using colored bowl traps. As a result, 2430 bees were collected and identified to the subfamily level. Andreninae was the most prevalent pollinator visiting all taxa of willows, followed by Hylaeinae and Colletinae. There were no significant differences in the number of pollinators collected from either native or introduced taxa during the progressive willow flowering during mid-March–May of 2021 and 2022, suggesting their equal attractiveness to pollinators. Similarly, during the concurrent flowering of the two native and two introduced taxa, there were no significant differences in the number of pollinators associated with either group suggesting that when pollinators had foraging choices, they were similarly attracted to both native and introduced willows. The overall finding of this study suggested that plantings of either native or introduced willows to meet bioenergy goals offer similar benefits of floral resources for pollinators.
“…It has been previously suggested that planting willows near fruit and berry crops is an effective way to increase fruit production via increased pollination [14,51]. Both native and introduced willows may be strategically planted near agricultural fields along with pollinator-dependent crops to provide essential nutrient resources for bees prior to the mass flowering of agricultural crops.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, willows support a high density of breeding bird communities by providing services such as nesting, food, and stopover sites [13]. Willows are considered an ecosystem "foundation species", due to the high number of insects they bolster [14]. Furthermore, willow short rotation coppice (SRC) plantations reduce the negative consequences of habitat fragmentation with the provision of food and shelter for a high proportion of animals that move from adjacent habitats into the plantations [15].…”
Introduced willows have mostly been employed as a renewable feedstock for bioenergy in the northeastern USA. The question of whether introduced willows provide the same biodiversity value and attractiveness as native willows has not yet been explored. The objective of this study was to compare the attractiveness of native and introduced willows to different subfamilies of bees. The common garden experiment planted at Storrs, CT, USA, included three native (S. eriocephala, S. sericea, S. lucida) and three introduced (S. ‘SX64’, S. ‘Onondaga’, S. ‘S365’) willows. Various willow taxa flowered at different times through spring, allowing pollinators to be collected over a 6-week period using colored bowl traps. As a result, 2430 bees were collected and identified to the subfamily level. Andreninae was the most prevalent pollinator visiting all taxa of willows, followed by Hylaeinae and Colletinae. There were no significant differences in the number of pollinators collected from either native or introduced taxa during the progressive willow flowering during mid-March–May of 2021 and 2022, suggesting their equal attractiveness to pollinators. Similarly, during the concurrent flowering of the two native and two introduced taxa, there were no significant differences in the number of pollinators associated with either group suggesting that when pollinators had foraging choices, they were similarly attracted to both native and introduced willows. The overall finding of this study suggested that plantings of either native or introduced willows to meet bioenergy goals offer similar benefits of floral resources for pollinators.
“…Data from all five transects were combined, creating a single dataset for each site. As in other pollinator studies (e.g., Roof et al, 2018 ;Graham et al 2021 ;Mitchell et al 2021 ), we defined blooming stems as individual flowers or clusters of flowers arranged on a stem.…”
“…(Rood et al 2003;Golet et al 2011). The faunal diversity can indicate the success of riparian ecosystem restoration (Golet et al 2008 and2011;Gollan et al 2011;Wortley et al 2013;Mitchell et al 2021); however, a few studies have shown that not all species can be taken into account. For example, using prey availability was not successful in the evaluation of the restoration programme at lower Colorado River (Rubin et al 2019).…”
Section: Assessment Of Riparian Restorationmentioning
Ecosystems across the globe, be it terrestrial, marine or transitional in nature are under pressure due to multiple drivers of changes including anthropogenic. Restoring the vitality of degraded systems is crucial for fulfilling the UN-Sustainable Development Goals in a timely manner. It is also essential for attaining the targets of the ambitious UN-Decade on Ecosystem Restoration (UN-DER). Riparian ecosystems are one among systems undergoing drastic changes due to anthropogenic pressures. They are a heterogeneous and biodiversity rich system due to its transitional zone occurrence between terrestrial and aquatic realms, including riverbanks, floodplains and wetlands, and provide ecosystem services on both local as well as global levels. Here we review the prospects of restoring riparian ecosystems in the context of the UN-DER. Even though the momentum for restoring riparian habitats began in the 1970s, our study reveals that intensive restoration programmes across the world are sparse and more efforts are needed to restore degraded riparian systems for regaining ecosystem health and complexity. Furthermore, an in-depth analysis of various strategies deployed for restoring riparian ecosystems around the world reveals that a participatory approach and site-specific strategies are needed for better output. Also, active along with passive restoration is required for better recovery. We suggest a three-stage strategy-preassessment, restoration activities and post monitoring and maintenance. It includes the involvement of stakeholders across all stages, which also supports their livelihoods. The restoration of riparian ecosystems supports the targets of UN-DER while providing both global as well as local ecosystem services.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.