1975
DOI: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(75)84711-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feed Processing. VIII. Estimating Microbial Protein in Rumen Fluid with Presipitating Agents or in Incubated Mixtures of Uncooked Grain Plus Urea or Starea with Differential Centrifugation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

1977
1977
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our collective results and those of others suggest that most, if not all, of the individual chemical and physical factors we used were additive in their effects. Methanol was evaluated as a component of treatment solutions because of its reported ability to remove the polysaccharide capsule produced by bacteria (Barr et al, 1975). The addition of 1.0% methanol increased removal of PAB from 50 t o 70% in Exp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our collective results and those of others suggest that most, if not all, of the individual chemical and physical factors we used were additive in their effects. Methanol was evaluated as a component of treatment solutions because of its reported ability to remove the polysaccharide capsule produced by bacteria (Barr et al, 1975). The addition of 1.0% methanol increased removal of PAB from 50 t o 70% in Exp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Retained particles (enclosed in the cloth) were subjected to three successive cycles of washing and shaking in a total volume of 700 ml saline solution (9 g NaCl/l distilled water) at 4-58C in order to remove trapped-fluid-associated microorganisms. The rumen liquid and saline wash fractions obtained were subjected to double centrifugation (Barr et al 1975) to obtain LAB samples. The total bacterial pellets were lyophilised, weighed and analysed for DM and N. SAB were isolated from the washed solid phase and from the precipitate resulting from the first slow centrifugation during LAB isolation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dados na literatura apontam diferenças entre produtos principalmente nas concentrações de nitrogênio não protéico (Deyoe et al, 1968;Helmer et al, 1970b;Shiehzadeh & Harbers, 1974;Barr et al, 1975;Lee et al, 1975;Stiles et al, 1975b;Wright & Totusek, 1975;Maia et al, 1987;Feitosa et al, 2000e Ezequiel et al, 2000, encontrando valores de equivalente protéico de 23 a 150%. As fontes de amido podem alterar a qualidade do produto (Shiehzadeh & Harbers, 1974;Barr et al, 1975;Stiles et al, 1975be Teixeira et al, 1999, como o grau de gelatinização do amido (Shiehzadeh & Harbers, 1974;Barr et al, 1975e Stiles et al, 1975a, a forma física da amiréia Carmo et al, 1999;Feitosa et al, 2000e Ezequiel et al, 2000 e a relação enxofre:nitrogênio (Thompson et al, 1972).…”
Section: Fatores Que Podem Alterar a Qualidade Da Amiréiaunclassified
“…Em um trabalho de pesquisa in vitro, Barr et al (1975) observaram que a síntese de proteína microbiana no tratamento com amiréia (45S, milho) não diferiu da mistura uréia mais milho extrusado e ambos foram superiores à mistura uréia mais milho moído. Utilizando amiréia (70S, sorgo) com três procedimentos de fabricação, todos proporcionaram uma maior síntese de proteína microbiana comparado à mistura uréia mais sorgo moído, mas não utilizaram sorgo extrusado nesta comparação.…”
Section: Amiréia X Uréiaunclassified