2014
DOI: 10.1080/09712119.2014.963095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feed intake and growth performance of goats fed with Napier grass and oil palm frond supplemented with soya waste

Abstract: The effect of Napier grass and oil palm frond (OPF) supplemented with soya waste on the intake and growth performance of goats was evaluated. Twelve female cross-bred goats (Boer × local) were divided into three groups and randomly assigned to three experimental diets: (1) Napier grass ad libitum (NG), (2) OPF ad libitum (OPF) and (3) Napier grass ad libitum+ OPF ad libitum (NG-OPF). All goats in each group received soya waste at the rate of 1.3% of their body weight (BW). Dry matter intake per kg unit of BW w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
9
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
9
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The lower intake of goats fed with rations containing formaldehyde-protected SBM (PSBM50 and PSBM100) indicates that Kacang goats did not like the palatability of the rations because goats are selective feeders, as stated by Rahman et al . [29]. Although the DMI of the goats fed formaldehyde-protected SBM (541.1 and 606.9 g for PSBM50 and PSBM100, respectively) in this research were lower than those of the goats in Rahman et al .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lower intake of goats fed with rations containing formaldehyde-protected SBM (PSBM50 and PSBM100) indicates that Kacang goats did not like the palatability of the rations because goats are selective feeders, as stated by Rahman et al . [29]. Although the DMI of the goats fed formaldehyde-protected SBM (541.1 and 606.9 g for PSBM50 and PSBM100, respectively) in this research were lower than those of the goats in Rahman et al .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Although the DMI of the goats fed formaldehyde-protected SBM (541.1 and 606.9 g for PSBM50 and PSBM100, respectively) in this research were lower than those of the goats in Rahman et al . [29], their ADG was higher (41.5 and 56.5 g for PSBM50 and PSBM100, respectively, vs. 30.8-43.5 g for Rahman et al . research).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, DMI was higher in T2 and T3 than T1, suggesting better palatability of the by-products than para-grass alone. Higher DMI was also reported in a previous study, in which goats were fed a combination of palm frond and Napier grass [1]. Higher palatability when replacing with PO by-products was not due to fat content since DMI was not parallel with fat content of T2 and T3.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The OPF as well as palm tree by-products (palm oil; PO, decanter; DC, palm kernel cakes; PKC and oil palm meal; OPM) have been extensively studied as a feed for ruminants. A study in goats showed that OPF or Napier grass + OPF ad libitum increased crude protein (CP) intake when compared with Napier grass [1]. The PO supplementation had no effect on growth performance but decreased cholesterol level in Black Bengal goats [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intake and digestibility There were differences (p < 0.05) among treatments with regards to all parameters measured (average daily feed intake, ADFI; dry matter intake, DMI; crude protein intake, CPI; nitrogen free extract intake, NFEI; acid detergent bre intake, ADFI and neutral detergent bre intake, NDFI) for nutrient intake ( Increased nutrient intake is an important factor for improved productivity in and utilization of feed by ruminants (19) which may be associated with some factors such as the palatability of the feed, low bre fraction etc. (20). This translates to the reason which may have brought about this results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%