“…He finds that FiT policies have a positive effect on RES development while RPS policies have a negative effect. Trypolska [9] reviews the recently adopted legislation on FiTs in Ukraine, focusing on its advantages and drawbacks, as well as on the related challenges, and recently Islam and Meade [10] using data from Ontario, where a generous FiT is available to households generating electricity from solar panels, measure household level preferences for panels and use these preferences along with household characteristics to predict adoption time intentions. Wand and Leuthold [11] examine the potential effects of Germany's FiT policy employing a partial equilibrium approach while Couture and Gagnon [2] analyze the different ways to structure the remuneration of a FiT policy, divided into two broad categories: those in which remuneration is dependent on the electricity price, and those that remain independent from it.…”